Skip to main content
Review | Acta Pedagogia Asiana | Volume 5 - Issue 2 - 2026 | 304−324 | https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i2.1187
© 2026 by the author(s), and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License

The Role of Authentic Assessment in Improving Learning Outcomes: A Review of Formative and Summative Assessment Practices

Author(s): Phoebe Kate V. Jacob ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7788-8661
Author(s) information:
Surigao del Norte State University, Surigao City, Philippines

Corresponding author

Acta Pedagogia Asiana

Volume 5 - Issue 2 - 2026

 About the journal
Submit your article

Authentic assessment has emerged as an important educational approach that promoted meaningful learning by engaging students in real-world and performance-based tasks. This study reviewed existing literature on the role of authentic assessment in improving learning outcomes, with emphasis on formative and summative assessment practices. A systematic literature review design was employed using studies retrieved from academic databases such as Google Scholar, ERIC, Scopus, and ScienceDirect. Relevant studies published between 2015 and 2025 were screened and analyzed through thematic analysis. The findings revealed that authentic assessment significantly enhanced students’ critical thinking, problem-solving abilities, and application of knowledge in real-life contexts. Formative assessment was found to support continuous learning through timely feedback, progress monitoring, and reflective practices, while summative assessment effectively evaluated overall student achievement through performance tasks, project-based activities, and portfolio assessment. The review also highlighted the importance of rubrics and scoring guides in ensuring transparent and consistent evaluation, as well as the value of student-centered evaluation in promoting active participation, self-reflection, and ownership of learning. Overall, the literature suggested that authentic assessment contributed to deeper understanding and improved learning outcomes across educational settings. The study recommended the integration of authentic assessment strategies into classroom instruction and encouraged further research on digital and discipline-based applications of authentic assessment practices.

Read Full-Text
Previous article
Next article

Black, P.; Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7‒74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102.

Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA.

Darling-Hammond, L.; Adamson, F.; Falk, B. (2013). Beyond the Bubble Test: How Performance Assessments Support 21st Century Learning; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA.

Gulikers, J.; Baartman, L. (2017). Do students perceive assessments as authentic? A review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42, 1‒16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1041193.

Nicol, D.J.; Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199‒218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090.

Brown, S.; Race, P. (2013). Using Effective Assessment to Promote Learning. In Teaching in Higher Education; Routledge: London, UK.

Topping, K. (2017). Peer assessment: Learning by judging and discussing the work of other learners. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, 1, 1‒17. https://doi.org/10.31532/interdiscipeducpsychol.1.1.007.

Thomas, J.W. (2000). A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning; Autodesk Foundation: San Rafael, CA, USA.

Barrett, H. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50, 436‒449. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.50.6.2.

Andrade, H.G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57, 13‒18.

Brookhart, S.M. (2013). How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading; ASCD: Alexandria, VA, USA.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education; Macmillan: New York, NY, USA.

McTighe, J.; Wiggins, G. (2005). Understanding by Design, 2nd ed.; ASCD: Alexandria, VA, USA.

Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA.

Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in University Assessment: Learning from Award-Winning Practice; Routledge: London, UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740613.

Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64‒70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.

Gulikers, J.T.M.; Bastiaens, T.J.; Kirschner, P.A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 67‒86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676.

Herrington, J.; Herrington, A. (2006). What is an authentic learning environment? In Authentic Learning Environments in Higher Education; Hershey, P.A., Ed.; IGI Global: Pennsylvania, PA, USA; pp. 1‒13.

Lombardi, M.M. (2008). Making the grade: The role of assessment in authentic learning. Educause Learning Initiative, 1, 1‒15.

Authentic Assessment Toolbox. (accessed on 07 May 2026) Available online: https://jonfmueller.com/toolbox/.

Panadero, E.; Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129‒144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002.

Boud, D.; Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 698‒712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

Carless, D.; Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, 1315‒1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.

Tai, J.; Ajjawi, R.; Boud, D.; Dawson, P.; Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76, 467‒481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.

Andrade, H.; Brookhart, S.M. (2019). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27, 350‒372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992.

Panadero, E.; Broadbent, J.; Boud, D.; Lodge, J.M. (2019). Using formative assessment to influence self- and co-regulated learning: The role of evaluative judgement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34, 535‒557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0407-8.

Yan, Z.; Boud, D. (2022). Conceptualizing assessment-as-learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47, 651‒662. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1920311.

Fraile, J.; Panadero, E.; Pardo, R. (2017). Co-creating rubrics: The effects on self-regulated learning, self-efficacy and performance. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 49‒58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.02.003.

Villarroel, V.; Bloxham, S.; Bruna, D.; Bruna, C.; Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, 840‒854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396.

Sambell, K.; Brown, S.; Race, P. (2019). Assessment to Support Student Learning; Routledge: London, UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429424440.

Dawson, P. (2017). Assessment rubrics: Towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42, 347‒360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294.

Bloxham, S.; den-Outer, B.; Hudson, J.; Price, M. (2016). Let’s stop the pretence of consistent marking: Exploring the multiple limitations of assessment criteria. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 466‒481. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1024607.

Adie, L.; Willis, J.; Van der Kleij, F. (2018). Diverse perspectives on student agency in classroom assessment. Australian Educational Researcher, 45, 1‒12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0262-2.

Brown, G.T.L.; Harris, L.R. (2014). The future of self-assessment in classroom practice. Frontline Learning Research, 3, 1‒7. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v3i1.24.

Wiliam, D. (2018). Embedded Formative Assessment, 2nd ed.; Solution Tree Press: Bloomington, IN, USA.

Bennett, R.E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18, 5‒25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678.

Kingston, N.; Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30, 28‒37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x.

Earl, L.M. (2013). Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning, 2nd ed.; Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

Heritage, M. (2018). Formative Assessment in Practice: A Process of Inquiry and Action; Harvard Education Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

Spector, J.M.; Ifenthaler, D.; Sampson, D.; Yang, L.J.; Mukama, E.; Warusavitarana, A.; Dona, K.; Eichhorn, K.; Fluck, A.; Huang, R.; et al. (2016). Technology enhanced formative assessment for 21st century learning. Educational Technology & Society, 19, 58‒71.

Redecker, C.; Johannessen, Ø. (2013). Changing assessment—Towards a new assessment paradigm using ICT. European Journal of Education, 48, 79‒96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12018.

Holmes, N.G. (2018). Engaging with assessment: Increasing student engagement through continuous assessment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19, 23‒34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417723230.

Ryan, T.; Henderson, M. (2018). Feeling feedback: Students’ emotional responses to educator feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, 880‒892. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1416456.

Bearman, M.; Dawson, P.; Ajjawi, R.; Tai, J.; Boud, D. (2020). Re-imagining university assessment in a digital world. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45, 110‒122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1663245.

Jönsson, A. (2014). Rubrics as a way of providing transparency in assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 840‒852. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.875117.

Hattie, J.; Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81‒112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.

Ashford-Rowe, K.; Herrington, J.; Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 205‒222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566.

McArthur, J. (2016). Assessment for social justice: The role of assessment in achieving social justice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 967‒981. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1053429.

Tai, J.; Canny, B.J.; Haines, T.P.; Molloy, E.K. (2016). The role of peer-assisted learning in building evaluative judgement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 1121‒1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1048180.

Nicol, D. (2021). The power of internal feedback: Exploiting natural comparison processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46, 756‒778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314.

Yan, Z.; Brown, G.T.L. (2017). A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42, 1247‒1262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091.

Pereira, D.; Flores, M.A.; Simão, A.M.V. (2016). Challenges to the effectiveness of assessment feedback: Students’ perspectives. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 49, 1‒7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.03.001.

Beaumont, C.; O’Doherty, M.; Shannon, L. (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education, 36, 671‒687. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003731135.

Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 324‒328. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700414.

Looney, J.W. (2011). Integrating formative and summative assessment: Progress toward a seamless system? OECD Education Working Papers, 58, 1‒58. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kghx3kbl734-en.

Jonsson, A.; Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130‒144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002.

Boud, D.; Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term; Routledge: London, UK.

OECD. (2018). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030; OECD Publishing: Paris, France.

UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education; UNESCO Publishing: Paris, France.

Read Full-Text
About this article

SUBMITTED: 07 May 2026
ACCEPTED: 28 May 2026
PUBLISHED: 31 May 2026
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 21 days
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i2.1187

Cite this article
Jacob, P. K. V. . (2026). The Role of Authentic Assessment in Improving Learning Outcomes: A Review of Formative and Summative Assessment Practices. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 5(2), 304−324. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i2.1187
Citations
0
Share this article