Skip to main content
Review | Acta Pedagogia Asiana | Volume 5 - Issue 2 - 2026 | 346−364 | https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i2.1141
© 2026 by the author(s), and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License

Constructivist Teaching Strategies in Secondary Science Education: A Systematic Review of Student-Centered and Active Learning Approaches

Author(s): Cromwell B. Ancla Jr. , Mauricio S. Adlaon
Author(s) information:
Surigao del Norte State University, Surigao City, 8400, Philippines

Corresponding author

Acta Pedagogia Asiana

Volume 5 - Issue 2 - 2026

 About the journal
Submit your article

Constructivist teaching strategies have gained increasing attention in science education because they emphasize student-centered, inquiry-oriented, and active learning experiences. This study presents a systematic review of empirical research on constructivist instructional approaches in secondary science education published between 2019 and 2025. Following the PRISMA 2020 framework, a structured literature search was conducted using Scopus, ERIC, and Google Scholar. Eighty-eight records were initially identified, and after duplicate removal, screening, and eligibility assessment, 43 studies were included in the final qualitative synthesis. The reviewed literature examined several constructivist approaches, including Problem-Based Learning, Inquiry-Based Learning, cooperative learning, guided inquiry laboratory activities, project-based learning, and integrated constructivist instructional models. A thematic synthesis approach was employed to analyze cognitive, affective, and skill-based learning outcomes across the studies. Unlike earlier reviews that mainly focused on single instructional approaches, this review comparatively synthesized multiple constructivist strategies within a unified analytical framework. The findings revealed that constructivist instructional approaches were consistently associated with improvements in academic achievement, conceptual understanding, engagement, critical thinking, science process skills, creativity, collaboration, and motivation. Problem-Based Learning and Inquiry-Based Learning emerged as the most frequently implemented and strongly supported strategies. However, the review also identified important implementation challenges related to instructional scaffolding, teacher preparedness, classroom management, resource limitations, and contextual variation. Some studies further suggested that constructivist approaches did not always produce immediate learning gains when instructional support was insufficient. Overall, the findings indicate that constructivist teaching strategies offer strong potential for improving secondary science education when they are carefully designed and effectively facilitated in classrooms.

Read Full-Text
Previous article
Next article

Akçay, B.; Benek, I. (2024). Problem-based learning in Türkiye: A systematic literature review of research in science education. Education Sciences, 14(3), 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030330.

Bremner, N.; Sakata, N.; Cameron, L. (2022). The outcomes of learner-centred pedagogy: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Development, 92, 102649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102649.

Funa, A.A.; Prudente, M.S. (2021). Effectiveness of problem-based learning on secondary students’ achievement in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1445a.

Alarcon, D.A.U.; Talavera-Mendoza, F.; Paucar, F.H.R.; Caceres, K.S.C.; Viza, R.M. (2023). Science and inquiry-based teaching and learning: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1170487. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1170487.

Dah, N.M.; Noor, M.S.A.M.; Kamarudin, M.Z.; Azziz, S.S.A. (2024). The impacts of open inquiry on students’ learning in science: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 45, 100601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100601.

Chengere, A.M.; Bono, B.D.; Zinabu, S.A.; Jilo, K.W. (2025). Enhancing secondary school students’ science process skills through guided inquiry-based laboratory activities in biology. PLOS ONE, 20, e0320692. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320692.

Gavrilas, L.; Kotsis, K. (2025). Integrating learning theories and innovative pedagogies in STEM education: A comprehensive review. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 5, 11−17. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/16538.

Ješková, Z.; Lukáč, S.; Snajder, L.; Guniš, J.; Klein, D.; Kireš, M. (2022). Active learning in STEM education with regard to the development of inquiry skills. Education Sciences, 12(10), 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100686.

Cebrero, J. (2025). 21st century skills and science achievement among secondary school students: A systematic review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 22(2), 248−268.. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2025.013.

Halawa, S.; Lin, T.-C.; Hsu, Y.-S. (2024). Exploring instructional design in K–12 STEM education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00503-5.

Ilahi, D.P.; Festiyed; Yerimadesi; Yulkifli; Utami, L.; Ratih, A. (2024). Evaluating the impact of problem-based learning on students’ metacognition in science learning: A meta-analysis review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(8), 526–535. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i8.7892.

Uluçınar, U. (2023). The effect of problem-based learning in science education on academic achievement: A meta-analytical study. Science Education International, 34(2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v34.i2.1.

Yaşar, M.; Batdı, V.; Kiliç, A.N.; Yılmaz, Z.A. (2024). Problem-based learning in science education: A mixed meta method study. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 24(2), 3972−3992. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.24.re406.

Kapıcı, H.O. (2025). Does inquiry-based learning work better in regular classrooms or computer-based settings? Instructional Science, 53, 705–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09711-0.

Mediana, N.; Funa, A.; Dio, R. (2025). Effectiveness of inquiry-based learning (IBL) on improving students’ conceptual understanding in science and mathematics: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 13(2), 532–552. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4769.

Strat, T.T.S.; Henriksen, E.; Jegstad, K. (2023). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 60, 191–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148.

Gillies, R.M. (2023). Using cooperative learning to enhance students’ learning and engagement during inquiry-based science. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1242. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121242.

Laid, S.M.T.; Adlaon, M.S. (2025). A systematic review of innovative teaching strategies in science: Exploring hands-on learning, technology integration, and student-centered approaches. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 4, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v4i2.645.

Lee, G.; Kang, D. (2024). A systematic review of research on cooperative/collaborative learning in science and engineering education in the Republic of Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 10(2), 162–195. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10081.

Saifuddin, T.; Matloob, F. (2025). Transforming classrooms through collaboration: Enhancing engagement and achievement in secondary science education through action research. Social Science Review Archives, 3(3), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i3.863.

Yeung, E.K.L.; Zhong, M.; Huang, J.; Chan, M.H.; Siu, C.; Cheung, H. (2024). Constructivist learning approaches do not necessarily promote immediate learning outcome or interest in science learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34, 753–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00893-8.

Jerrim, J.; Oliver, M.; Sims, S. (2019). The relationship between inquiry-based teaching and students’ achievement: New evidence from a longitudinal PISA study in England. Learning and Instruction, 61, 35−44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.004.

Leeuwen, A. van; Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 27, 71−89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.001.

MacIntosh, N.; Asghar, A. (2025). An integrated framework to motivate student engagement in science education for sustainable development. Education Sciences, 15(7), 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070903.

Pinar, F.; Panergayo, A.; Sagcal, R.; Acut, D.; Roleda, L.; Prudente, M. (2025). Fostering scientific creativity in science education through scientific problem-solving approaches and STEM contexts: A meta-analysis. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 7, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-025-00137-9.

Wijnia, L.; Noordzij, G.; Arends, L.; Rikers, R.; Loyens, S. (2024). The effects of problem-based, project-based, and case-based learning on students’ motivation: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09864-3.

Arega, N.; Hunde, T. (2025). Constructivist instructional approaches: A systematic review of evaluation-based evidence for effectiveness. Review of Education, 3, e70040. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70040.

Doolittle, P.; Wojdak, K.; Walters, A. (2023). Defining active learning: A restricted systematic review. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 11, 25. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.25.

Smith, K.; Maynard, N.; Berry, A.; Stephenson, T.; Spiteri, T.; Corrigan, D.; Mansfield, J.; Ellerton, P.; Smith, T. (2022). Principles of problem-based learning (PBL) in STEM education: Using expert wisdom and research to frame educational practice. Education Sciences, 12(10), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728.

Magaji, A. (2021). Promoting problem-solving skills among secondary science students through problem-based learning. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 549–566. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14432a.

Magaji, A.; Adjani, M.; Coombes, S. (2024). A systematic review of preservice science teachers’ experience of problem-based learning and implementing it in the classroom. Education Sciences, 14(3), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030301.

Navy, S.; Maeng, J.; Bell, R.; Kaya, F. (2021). Beginning secondary science teachers’ implementation of process skills, inquiry, and problem-based learning during the induction years: A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Science Education, 43, 1483–1503. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1919334.

Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, F.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, X.; Pi, Z. (2024). Do science teachers’ beliefs related to inquiry-based teaching affect students’ science process skills? Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 6, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00089-y.

Stevenson, E.; Dawborn-Gundlach, M.; Van Driel, J.; Krell, M. (2025). Supporting secondary school science teachers to teach science inquiry skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21, em2670. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16614.

Meulenbroeks, R.; Van Rijn, R.; Reijerkerk, M. (2023). Fostering secondary school science students’ intrinsic motivation by inquiry-based learning. Research in Science Education, 54(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10139-0.

Xu, S.; Reiss, M.; Lodge, W. (2024). Enhancing scientific creativity through an inquiry-based teaching approach in secondary science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 48, 619–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2419987.

Salih, H.M.; Arif, J.; Sabri, S. (2024). Collaborative learning in computer labs for science education. Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture, and Social Studies, 4(1), 12−23. https://doi.org/10.53754/iscs.v4i1.659.

Ospankulova, E.; Maxutov, S.; Lathrop, R.; Anuarova, L.; Balta, N. (2024). Science students’ attitudes, learning, critical thinking and engagement in project-based learning. Cogent Education, 12, 2445358. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2445358.

Sutiani, A.; Situmorang, M.; Silalahi, A. (2021). Implementation of an inquiry learning model with science literacy to improve student critical thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14, 117−138. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1428a.

Nguyen, K.; Borrego, M.; Finelli, C.; DeMonbrun, M.; Crockett, C.; Tharayil, S.; Shekhar, P.; Waters, C.; Rosenberg, R. (2021). Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7.

Mpaso, C.N.; Xuefu, X. (2025). Student-centred approaches: Translating theory into practice by science teachers in Malawi secondary schools’ context. Unnes Science Education Journal, 14(1), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v14i1.12474.

Ridani, M.; Arianingrum, R. (2024). Type of active learning implementation in science education: A systematic review. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 7(2), 394–403. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v7i2.65623.

Saad, R.B.; Garcia, A.L.; Garcia, J.M.C. (2025). Mapping constructivist active learning for STEM: Toward sustainable education. Sustainability, 17(13), 6225. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17136225.

Read Full-Text
About this article

SUBMITTED: 07 April 2026
ACCEPTED: 29 May 2026
PUBLISHED: 2 June 2026
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 53 days
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i2.1141

Cite this article
Ancla Jr., C. B., & Adlaon, M. S. . (2026). Constructivist Teaching Strategies in Secondary Science Education: A Systematic Review of Student-Centered and Active Learning Approaches. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 5(2), 346−364. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i2.1141
Citations
0
Share this article