Skip to main content
Review | Acta Pedagogia Asiana | Volume 5 - Issue 2 - 2026 | 389−404 | https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i2.1113
© 2026 by the author(s), and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License

Instructional Leadership Models in Education: A Comparative Review of Practices in the Philippines and Selected Countries

Author(s): Diana Mae Planteras ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2048-370X
Author(s) information:
Surigao del Norte State University-Main Campus, Narciso Street, Surigao City 8400, Surigao del Norte, Philippines

Corresponding author

Acta Pedagogia Asiana

Volume 5 - Issue 2 - 2026

 About the journal
Submit your article

Instructional leadership was widely recognized as a key factor in improving school effectiveness and student learning outcomes. Despite its global relevance, leadership practices differed according to governance systems, cultural contexts, and accountability structures. This study aimed to examine instructional leadership models in selected countries and determine their implications for strengthening educational leadership in the Philippines. A systematic review of international and local literature was conducted, synthesizing empirical studies and policy documents from the United States, Finland, Singapore, Australia, and the Philippines. The analysis focused on governance structures, leadership preparation, autonomy, accountability, and cultural influences. The findings revealed common dimensions across countries, including curriculum supervision, teacher professional development, and student achievement orientation. However, variations existed in levels of autonomy, leadership training systems, and accountability mechanisms. Centralized systems emphasized structured frameworks and performance monitoring, while decentralized systems promoted professional trust and shared leadership. In the Philippine context, instructional leadership was guided by national standards but constrained by administrative workload, limited autonomy, and resource challenges. Emerging trends included distributed leadership, data-informed decision-making, equity-focused practices, and the influence of global policy exchange. Instructional leadership was shaped by contextual factors and needed to be adapted to local realities. Strengthening leadership preparation, reducing administrative demands, and promoting collaborative and evidence-based practices were essential for improving learning outcomes in Philippine schools.

Read Full-Text
Previous article
Next article

Hallinger, P.; Walker, A. (2017). Leading learning in Asia: Emerging empirical insights from five societies. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(2), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2016-0105.

Robinson, V.M.J. (2011). Student-centered leadership. 3rd ed.; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, USA.

Day, C.; Gu, Q.; Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863.

Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads (PPSSH). DepEd. (accessed on 1 March 2026) Available online: https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/DO_s2020_024-.pdf.

Walker, A.; Hallinger, P. (2015). A synthesis of reviews of research on principal leadership in East Asia. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(4), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-05-2015-0038.

Leithwood, K.; Harris, A.; Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22.

Ng, F.S.D.; Nguyen, T.D.; Wong, K.Y.; Choy, K.W. (2015). Instructional leadership practices in Singapore. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(4), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213510501.

Bush, T.; Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680.

Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. (accessed on 1 March 2026) Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707.

Liu, S.; Hallinger, P.; Feng, D. (2016). Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference? Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.023.

Spillane, J.P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, USA.

Qian, H.; Walker, A.; Li, X. (2017). The west wind versus the east wind: Instructional leadership model in China. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(2), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2016-0083.

OECD. (2016). School leadership for learning: Insights from TALIS 2013. OECD Publishing: Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264258341-en.

Leithwood, K.; Sun, J.; Pollock, K. (2017). How school leaders contribute to student success: The four paths framework. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50980-8.

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142.

Harris, A. (2014). Distributed leadership matters: Perspectives, practicalities, and potential. Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks, USA.

Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

Walker, A.; Qian, H. (2022). Developing a model of instructional leadership in China. School Leadership & Management, 42(3), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.1966804.

Goddard, R.; Goddard, Y.; Kim, E.S.; Miller, R. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501–530. https://doi.org/10.1086/681925.

Bush, T. (2018). Preparation and induction for school principals: Global perspectives. Management in Education, 32(2), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020618761805.

Lingard, B.; Hayes, D.; Mills, M.; Christie, P. (2003). Leading learning: Making hope practical in schools. Open University Press: Buckingham, UK.

Shatzer, R.H.; Caldarella, P.; Hallam, P.R.; Brown, B.L. (2014). Comparing the effects of instructional and transformational leadership on student achievement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213502192.

Tan, L.D.C.; Urdan, T. (2025). Exploring the Responsibilities, Boundaries, and Well-Being of Teachers in the Philippines. Psychology International., 7, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/psycholint7010014.

Hosseingholizadeh, R.; Amoli, F.A.; Khoshhal, Y. (2021). The mediating role of teacher professionalism in the relationship between instructional leadership and teacher efficacy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 815–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438.

Cheng, Y.C. (2020). Educational reforms and paradigm shifts in Asia: Implications for school leadership. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09616-5.

Zepeda, S.J.; Bengtson, E.; Parylo, O. (2018). Examining the planning and management of instructional supervision in schools. Journal of Educational Supervision, 1(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.31045/jes.1.1.3.

Hallinger, P.; Liu, S.; Aung, P.N. (2025). A systematic state-of-the-art review of Asian research on principal instructional leadership, 1987–2024. Education Sciences, 15(7), 817. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070817.

Ng, P.T. (2016). Leadership for quality education in Singapore: Policy, practice, and prospects. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214549993.

Karimi, S.; Ahmadi Malek, F.; Yaghoubi Farani, A.; Liobikienė, G. (2023). The Role of Transformational Leadership in Developing Innovative Work Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Employees’ Psychological Capital. Sustainability, 15, 1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021267.

Harris, A.; Jones, M.; Crick, T. (2020). Curriculum leadership and COVID-19: Managing uncertainty in schools. School Leadership & Management, 40(5), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1810109.

OECD. (2019). Education in the Philippines: Reviews of national policies for education. OECD Publishing: Paris, France.

Samichan, H.; Hallinger, P.; Truong, T. D. (2021). Exploring instructional leadership in Vietnam: A multi-level analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220905037.

Hallinger, P.; Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–247.

Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31.

Louis, K.S.; Dretzke, B.; Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2010.486586.

Alanoğlu, M. (2022). Instructional leadership research trends: A bibliometric review. Sustainability, 14(13), 7984. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137984.

Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press: New York, USA.

Day, C.; Qing, G. (2019). Teacher emotions and resilience in the context of educational reforms. Teachers and Teaching, 25(3), 314–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1604808.

Pan, H.L.W.; Nyeu, F.Y.; Chen, L.S.; Cheng, S.H. (2017). Principal instructional leadership in Taiwan: Lessons from two decades of research. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(2), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2016-0006.

Gümüş, S.; Bellibaş, M.Ş.; Esen, M.; Gümüş, E. (2018). A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216659296.

Robinson, V.M.J.; Lloyd, C.A.; Rowe, K.J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.

Read Full-Text
About this article

SUBMITTED: 11 March 2026
ACCEPTED: 03 June 2026
PUBLISHED: 5 June 2026
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 85 days
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i2.1113

Cite this article
Planteras, D. M. (2026). Instructional Leadership Models in Education: A Comparative Review of Practices in the Philippines and Selected Countries. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 5(2), 389−404. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i2.1113
Citations
0
Share this article