Skip to main content

Development of a Unified Experiment-Based Exploration Sheet in General Physics 1 – Kinematics for Grade 12 Students of Surigao City National High School, Philippines

Author(s): Dyvie Calunsag Flores 1 , Mauricio S. Adlaon 2 ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3546-0774
Author(s) information:
1 Surigao City National High School, Surigao del Norte State University, Philippines
2 Surigao del Norte State University, Philippines

Corresponding author

This study aimed to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a Unified Experiment-Based Exploration Sheet for Grade 12 General Physics 1, focusing on the topic of kinematics. Studies have consistently shown that students experience misconceptions regarding motion, velocity, and acceleration, often interpreting velocity as synonymous with acceleration and struggling to distinguish scalar and vector quantities. The study was conducted in response to the persistent low performance of Filipino students in science, as evidenced by the Philippines’ below-average performance in the PISA 2022 assessment, and the continuing difficulty of students in understanding abstract physics concepts and problem-solving ability due to limited laboratory resources and traditional teaching approaches. Unlike existing inquiry-based activity sheets, the developed Unified Experiment-Based Exploration Sheet integrates standardized experimental procedures, locally available materials, and MELC-aligned inquiry activities into a single instructional resource designed specifically for Grade 12 Kinematics. Using a research and development design based on the 4D model (Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate), the Exploration Sheet was developed and validated by four experts providing qualitative evaluation and feedback. Fifty (50) Grade 12 STEM students from Surigao City National High School using stratified random sampling participated in the implementation phase. A 40-item multiple-choice test on kinematics was administered as a pre-test and post-test to measure learning gains. Descriptive statistics and a paired-samples t-test were used for data analysis. Results revealed that students’ mean pre-test score was 28.6 (SD = 5.37), which increased to a mean post-test score of 37.3 (SD = 4.64), yielding a mean gain score of 8.68 (SD = 6.61). The paired-samples t-test indicated a highly significant difference between pre-test and post-test scores (p < .001), confirming the effectiveness of the developed material. These findings suggest that the Unified Experiment-Based Exploration Sheet is an effective instructional material that can significantly improve students’ understanding of kinematics through structured, inquiry-based, and context-appropriate learning activities.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). PISA 2022 results: Factsheets – Philippines. (accessed on 1 March 2026) Available online: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/11/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_2fca04b9/philippines_dbf92b65/a0882a2d-en.pdf.

Limon, M.R. (2016). The effect of the adequacy of school facilities on students’ performance and achievement in technology and livelihood education. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 5(1), 47−59. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v5-i1/2060.

Reyes, R.; Pacala, F.A.A.; Bengua, G.; Entac, E. (2024). The correlation between students’ insights and academic achievement in science: A predictor for STEM career path. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 14(1), 1−18. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v14i1.17616.

Örnek, F.; Robinson, W.R.; Haugan, M.P. (2008). What makes physics difficult? International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3(1), 30–34.

Pullicino, N.; Bonello, C. (2020). Challenges Faced by Maltese Students Studying Advanced Level Physics. Information, 11, 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11080397.

Martini, B.; Michelini, M.; Stefanel, A.; Tombolato, M. (2021). Prospective Teachers’ Representations on the Concept of Force. Education Sciences, 11, 614. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100614.

Ma, H.; Yang, H.; Li, C.; Ma, S.; Li, G. (2025). The Effectiveness and Sustainability of Tier Diagnostic Technologies for Misconception Detection in Science Education: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 17, 3145. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073145.

Siddiqui, S. (2022). Categorized and Correlated Multiple-Choice Questions: A Tool for Assessing Comprehensive Physics Knowledge of Students. Education Sciences, 12, 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090575.

Kariotoglou, P.; Psillos, D. (2019). Teaching and Learning Pressure and Fluids. Fluids, 4, 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids4040194.

Suparno, P. (2013). Miskonsepsi dan perubahan konsep dalam pendidikan fisika; Grasindo: Jakarta, Indonesia.

SCIENCE - University of the Philippines Diliman. (accessed on 1 March 2026) Available online: https://science.upd.edu.ph/

Bransford, J.D.; Brown, A.L.; Cocking, R.R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA.

Black, P.; Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.

Paucar-Curasma, R.; Sapallanay-Gomez, N.N.; Cayllahua Yarasca, U.; Acra-Despradel, C.; Ponce-Aranibar, M.d.P. (2026). Enhancing Research Competencies in University Students Through a Polya-Based STEM Technology Integration Method. Education Sciences, 16, 929. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060929.

Wulandari, D.T.; Sayekti, I.C. (2022). Analisis kebutuhan pengembangan media kartu pada materi ekosistem berbasis QR-code untuk siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6428–6436. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3258.

Studhalter, U.T.; Leuchter, M.; Tettenborn, A.; Elmer, A.; Edelsbrunner, P.A.; Saalbach, H. (2021). Early science learning: The effects of teacher talk. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101371.

Avenir, F.A.; Bacani, B.B. (2025). Evaluation of developed learning module in General Physics 2 as a self-paced distance learning material. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v15i1.26093.

Pansri, B.; Thongchotchat, V.; Kurashige, K.; et al. (2025). Self-regulated learning in action: Empowering physics curriculum with ICT and practical approaches. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09854-6.

Salsabila, B.S.; Kartijono, N.E. (2023). The development of e-leaflet teaching materials using QR-code in human excretory system material. Journal of Biology Education, 12(2), 240–247.

Aguilar-Moya, R.; Diamanti, R.; Melero-Fuentes, D. (2025). Teaching Methods, Learning and Development: A 15-Year Research Perspective by Educational Stages. Education Sciences, 15, 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci1509121.

Dick, W.; Carey, L.; Carey, J.O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction, 8th ed.; Pearson: Boston, MA, USA.

Branch, R.M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach; Springer: New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6.

DeVellis, R.F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications, 4th ed.; SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 4th ed.; Pearson: Boston, MA, USA.

Sharma, G. (2017). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research, 3, 749–752.

Haladyna, T.M.; Rodriguez, M.C. (2013). Developing and validating test items; Routledge: New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850381.

Brookhart, S.M. (2024). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers revisited. Education Sciences, 14(7), 751. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070751.

Pallant, J. (2026). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS, 10th ed.; Routledge: London, UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003651147.

Fraenkel, J.R.; Wallen, N.E.; Hyun, H.H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA.

Moemeke, C.D.; Chukwunenye, J.N.; Malik, N.A. (2025). Understanding the theoretical foundations of inquiry-based learning: Pivot for productive science education in Africa. Educational Considerations, 50(3). https://doi.org/10.4148/0146-9282.2446.

Ballesta-Claver, J.; Ayllón Blanco, M.F.; Gómez Pérez, I.A. (2021). A Revisited Conceptual Change in Mathematical-Physics Education from a Neurodidactic Approach: A Pendulum Inquiry. Mathematics, 9, 1755. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9151755.

Santoso, P.H.; Istiyono, E.; Haryanto; Hidayatulloh, W. (2022). Thematic analysis of Indonesian physics education research literature using machine learning. Data, 7(11), 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/data7110147.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, USA.

Chand, S.P. (2023). Constructivism in education: Exploring the contributions of Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner. International Journal of Science and Research, 12(7), 274–278. https://doi.org/10.21275/sr23630021800.

About this article

SUBMITTED: 24 May 2026
ACCEPTED: 14 June 2026
PUBLISHED: 15 June 2026
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 21 days
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i2.1214

Cite this article
Flores, D. C. ., & Adlaon, M. S. (2026). Development of a Unified Experiment-Based Exploration Sheet in General Physics 1 – Kinematics for Grade 12 Students of Surigao City National High School, Philippines . Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 5(2), 426−438. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i2.1214
Citations
0
Share this article