Skip to main content
Articles | Acta Pedagogia Asiana | Volume 5 - Issue 2 - 2026 | 228−239 | https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i2.1091
© 2026 by the author(s), and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License

Comparative Perspective on Curriculum Design: The Philippines and Global Educational Systems

Author(s): Merianne D. Gucor , Mauricio S. Adlaon
Author(s) information:
Surigao del Norte State University, Surigao City, 8400, Philippines

Corresponding author

Acta Pedagogia Asiana

Volume 5 - Issue 2 - 2026

 About the journal
Submit your article

Curriculum design shapes national education systems and prepares learners to address global challenges. The Philippine K–12 curriculum, implemented in 2013, aligns with international standards but faces constraints related to flexibility, teacher autonomy, and interdisciplinary learning. This study systematically reviewed and compared Philippine curriculum frameworks with those of Finland, Singapore, the United States, and Japan to identify shared principles, distinctive features, and best practices. Peer-reviewed journal articles, national curriculum documents, and international education reports published between 2000 and 2025 were analyzed through thematic synthesis and comparative evaluation. The findings show that Philippine and global curricula share standards-based, competency-driven frameworks that emphasize 21st-century skills; however, they differ in governance, flexibility, teacher autonomy, and the integration of interdisciplinary learning. While the Philippines excels in contextualization and localization, other systems demonstrate greater adaptability, phenomenon-based learning, and technology-supported instruction. A re-conceptualized curriculum model is proposed that integrates global best practices while preserving local relevance. These insights highlight opportunities to enhance flexibility, empower teachers, promote interdisciplinary approaches, and integrate digital tools, thereby supporting evidence-based reforms and future research toward a globally aligned Philippine education system.

Read Full-Text
Previous article
Next article

Priestley, M.; Biesta, G.; Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: What is it and why does it matter? Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325.

Deng, Z. (2018). Contemporary curriculum theorizing and curriculum implications. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1537378.

Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. OECD Education Working Papers, 203, 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019.

Takayama, K. (2013). Globalisation and comparative education. Comparative Education, 49(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2012.740403.

Autio, T. (2017). Curriculum theory in educational reform. Curriculum Journal, 28(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1311007.

Wiggins, G.; McTighe, J. (2006). Understanding by design and curriculum development. Educational Leadership, 63(5), 98–102.

Mulder, M. (2017). Competence theory and research: A synthesis. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 23(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2017.1326548.

Harden, R. M. (2007). Outcome-based education: The future is today. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 625–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701729930.

Bernardo, A. B. I. (2020). Philippine education and curriculum reforms in the global context. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09654-8.

Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Curriculum development: Teacher involvement in curriculum development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 106–107.

Valdez, M. A. (2019). Contextualization and localization in Philippine education: Challenges and opportunities. Philippine Journal of Education Policy, 10(2), 45–60.

Sahlberg, P. (2016). Educational reform in Finland. Policy Futures in Education, 14(2), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210315612640.

Tan, C.; Chua, Y. (2018). Curriculum reforms in Singapore: Global competitiveness and local relevance. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1474845.

Porter, A.; McMaken, J.; Hwang, J.; Yang, R. (2014). Common Core standards: The new US intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 43(3), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14530903.

Takayama, K. (2008). The politics of international league tables. Journal of Education Policy, 23(4), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930801923725.

Read Full-Text
About this article

SUBMITTED: 03 March 2026
ACCEPTED: 25 May 2026
PUBLISHED: 28 May 2026
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 84 days
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i2.1091

Cite this article
Gucor, M. D., & Adlaon , M. S. . (2026). Comparative Perspective on Curriculum Design: The Philippines and Global Educational Systems. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 5(2), 228−239. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i2.1091
Citations
0
Share this article