Skip to main content
Special Issue: Enhancing the Student Experience | Acta Pedagogia Asiana | Volume 5 - Issue SI - 2026 | 36−44 | https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5iSI.1049
© 2026 by the author(s), and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License

Using Asynchronous Discussion Forums to Enhance Engagement of Students in Online Teaching

Author(s): Guanying Chu 1 , Yu Wang 2 , Qinglei Bu 1 , Bing Han 1 , Fei Xue 1 , Enggee Lim 1
Author(s) information:
1 Department of Electrical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China
2 Educational Development Unit, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China

Corresponding author

Acta Pedagogia Asiana

Acta Pedagogia Asiana

Volume 5 - Issue SI - 2026

 About the journal
Submit your article

The shift towards HyFlex learning in the post-pandemic era has introduced new challenges for higher education, particularly in maintaining student engagement and motivation in online learning environments. This paper examines the potential of anonymous asynchronous online discussion forums (AODFs) to enhance participation and engagement in large online classes. We propose a new model of forum management that integrates question-answering and peer-to-peer interaction, allowing students to post questions anonymously while responses remain non-anonymous. The study investigates the evolving roles of teachers and students in promoting and participating in forum activities, adopting a “students as partners” perspective. Data from the implemented AODF indicate increased student participation and motivation, with a substantial portion of non-academic questions addressed through peer discussion. Challenges such as lurking behavior and the limitations of relying solely on technology are also highlighted. The study underscores the critical role of instructors in evaluating and adapting emerging technologies to meet student needs and foster a sense of community in online learning environments.

Read Full-Text
Previous article
Next article

Hybrid-Flexible Course Design: Implementing Student-Directed Hybrid Classes. (accessed on 12 February 2026) Available online: https://edtechbooks.org/hyflex.

Nilsen, H. (2009). Influence on student academic behaviour through motivation, self-efficacy and value-expectation: An action research project to improve learning. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 6, 545–556. https://doi.org/10.28945/1080.

Zydney, J.; DeNoyelles, A.; Chen, B.; Patton, K. (2022). Enhancing online protocols through design-based research to improve cognitive presence in a large enrolment course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 53–68. http://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7649.

Malczyk, B.R. (2020). Introducing social work to hyflex blended learning: a student-centered approach. In On-line and Distance Social Work Education, 161–175; Routledge: Abingdon, UK.

Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. (accessed on 12 February 2026) Available online: https://celt.ucc.ie/events/htm/Studentspartners2014.pdf.

Curren, R. (2017). Why character education? Impact, 24, 1–44.

Ramsden, P. (2008). The Future of Higher Education: Teaching and the Student Experience; Higher Education Academy: York, UK.

Gilbert, P.K.; Dabbagh, N. (2005). How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 5–18. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00434.x.

Using bulletin boards for learning: what do staff and students need to know in order to use boards effectively? (accessed on 12 February 2026) Available online: https://web.archive.org/web/20011104160751/http://learning.uow.edu.au/elect/elecbunk.html.

Kıbaru, F. (2018). Supporting faculty to face challenges in design and delivery of quality courses in virtual learning environments. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19, 176–197. http://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.460158.

Trammell, B.A.; LaForge, C. (2017). Common challenges for instructors in large online courses: Strategies to mitigate student and instructor frustration. Journal of Educators Online, 14, Article n1. http://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2017.14.1.1.

Rolim, V.; Ferreira, R.; Lins, R.D.; Gasevic, D. (2019). A network-based analytic approach to uncovering the relationship between social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 53–65. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.01.003.

Garrison, D.R. (2015). Thinking Collaboratively: Learning in a Community of Inquiry; Routledge: London, UK.

Vaughan, N.D.; Cleveland-Innes, M.; Garrison, D.R. (2013). Teaching in Blended Learning Environments: Creating and Sustaining Communities of Inquiry; Athabasca University Press: Athabasca, Canada.

Hootstein, E. (2002). Wearing four pairs of shoes: The roles of e-learning facilitators. In E learn: World Conference on E learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 457–462; Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE): Chesapeake, VA, USA.

Hew, K.F.; Cheung, W.S.; Ng, C.S.L. (2010). Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: A review of the research and empirical exploration. Instructional Science, 38, 571–606. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9124-2.

Valenti, E.; Feldbush, T.; Mandernach, J. (2019). Comparison of faculty and student perceptions of videos in the online classroom. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16, 6. http://doi.org/10.53761/1.16.3.6.

Dennen, V.P. (2008). Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non posting discussion behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1624–1633. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.009.

Tsiotakis, P.; Jimoyiannis, A. (2016). Critical factors towards analysing teachers’ presence in online learning communities. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 45–58. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.001.

Mohamad, M.; Shaharuddin, S. (2014). Online forum discussion to promote sense of learning community among the group members. International Education Studies, 7, 61–74. http://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n13p61.

Roberts, L.D.; Rajah-Kanagasabai, C.J. (2013). “I’d be so much more comfortable posting anonymously”: Identified versus anonymous participation in student discussion boards. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 5. http://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.216.

You, J.W. (2016). Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course achievement in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 23–30. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.02.001.

Hew, K.F.; Cheung, W.S. (2008). Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussions: A case study of peer facilitation. Computers & Education, 51, 1111–1124. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.004.

Read Full-Text
About this article

SUBMITTED: 12 February 2026
ACCEPTED: 30 March 2026
PUBLISHED: 9 April 2026
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 47 days
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5iSI.1049

Cite this article
Chu, G. ., Wang, Y. ., Bu, Q., Han, B. ., Xue, F. ., & Lim, E. . (2026). Using Asynchronous Discussion Forums to Enhance Engagement of Students in Online Teaching. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 5(SI), 36−44. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5iSI.1049
Citations
0
Share this article