The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed a paradigm shift in education, accelerating the transition from traditional face-to-face instruction to virtual learning environments. This shift presented unique challenges for English as a Second Language (ESL) instruction, primarily due to reduced direct interaction and limited engagement between instructors and students. The inherent difficulties of ESL learning were further intensified in virtual settings, potentially leading to decreased student interest, motivation, and participation, particularly among learners accustomed to conventional classroom dynamics. A lack of social interaction in online environments often resulted in feelings of isolation and diminished motivation among ESL students. Nevertheless, when effectively designed, virtual learning environments enhanced teaching methodologies, enriched learning materials, and fostered students’ analytical skills, curiosity, creativity, and motivation. This study explored the strategies employed by three ESL lecturers to enhance and sustain student motivation in virtual learning contexts. The findings provided practical insights for universities adapting to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic and offered valuable implications for managing future educational disruptions.
Baytiyeh, H. (2018). Online learning during post-earthquake school closures. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 27, 215–227. http://doi.org/10.1108/DPM 07 2017 0173.
Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Yang, L.; Wang, C. (2020). Suspending Classes Without Stopping Learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID 19 outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13, 3. http://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13030055.
Classroom assistants in primary schools: Employment and deployment. (accessed on 6 January 2025) Available online: http://www.esds.ac.uk/findingData/snDescription.asp?sn=5199.
A short history of educational technology. (accessed on 6 January 2025) Available online: https://www.tonybates.ca/2014/12/10/a-short-history-of-educational-technology/.
Singh, V.; Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988–2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33, 289–306. http://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082.
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID 19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49, 5–22. http://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018.
Mukhtar, K.; Javed, K.; Arooj, M.; Sethi, A. (2020). Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID 19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36, S27–S31. http://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19 S4.2785.
Dhingra, S.; Pasricha, N.; Sthapak, E.; Bhatnagar, R. (2021). Assessing the role of internal motivation and extrinsic factors on online undergraduate medical teaching in a resource poor setting during COVID 19 pandemic in North India: An observational study. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 12, 817–823. http://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S312812.
Meşe, E.; Sevilen, Ç. (2021). Factors influencing EFL students’ motivation in online learning: A qualitative case study. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(1), 11–22. http://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.817680.
Gustiani, S. (2020). Students’ motivation in online learning during COVID 19 pandemic era: A case study. Holistics Journal, 12(2), 53–60.
Almahasees, Z.; Mohsen, K.; Amin, M.O. (2021). Faculty’s and students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID 19. Frontiers in Education, 6. http://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.638470.
Pavin Ivanec, T. (2022). The lack of academic social interactions and students’ learning difficulties during COVID 19 faculty lockdowns in Croatia: The mediating role of the perceived sense of life disruption caused by the pandemic and the adjustment to online studying. Social Sciences, 11, 2. http://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11020042.
Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. (2012). Self determination theory. In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, Vol. 1; Sage Publications Ltd: Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 416–436. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21.
Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. http://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. (2000). Self determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003 066X.55.1.68.
Kreijns, K.; Xu, K.; Weidlich, J. (2022). Social presence: Conceptualization and measurement. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 139–170. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10648 021 09623 8.
Gunawardena, C.N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1, 147–166.
Shen, K.N.; Yu, A.Y.; Khalifa, M. (2010). Knowledge contribution in virtual communities: Accounting for multiple dimensions of social presence through social identity. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29, 337–348.
Lamb, M. (2011). Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics, 1st ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
Lincoln, Y.S.; Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry, 1st ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Corbin, J.M. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd ed.; Sage Publications: Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Marshall, C.; Rossman, G.B. (2014). Designing Qualitative Research, 5th ed.; Sage Publications: Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kusuma, P.C.; Pahlevi, M.R.; Saefullah, H. (2021). EFL teachers’ perception towards online classroom interaction during COVID 19 pandemic. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 12, 68–79.
Wut, T.; Xu, J. (2021). Person to person interactions in online classroom settings under the impact of COVID 19: A social presence theory perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22, 371–383. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12564 021 09690 6.
Munoz, K.E.; Wang, M. J.; Tham, A. (2021). Enhancing online learning environments using social presence: Evidence from hospitality online courses during COVID 19. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 21, 339–357. http://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2021.1925649.
Ke, F.; Carr Chellman, A. (2006). Solitary learner in online collaborative learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7, 3–20.
Koh, M.H.; Barbour, M.; Hill, J.R. (2010). Strategies for instructors on how to improve online groupwork. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43, 183–205.
Koh, M.H.; Hill, J.R. (2009). Student perceptions of groupwork in an online course: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of E Learning & Distance Education, 23, 69–92.
SUBMITTED: 13 December 2025
ACCEPTED: 11 January 2026
PUBLISHED:
19 January 2026
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 29 days
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i1.965