Allenby, B.; Murphy, C.F.; Allen, D.; Davidson, C. (2009). Sustainable engineering education in the United States. Sustainability Science, 4, 7. http://doi/org/10.1007/s11625-009-0065-5.
Wilkinson, S.L. (1997). Green Is Practical, Even Profitable. Chemical & Engineering News, 75, 35-35. http:// doi.org/10.1021/cen-v075n031.p035.
Hesketh, R.P. (2017). Introduction to sustainable and green engineering: general principles and targets. In Encyclopedia of Sustainable Technologies, Abraham, M.A. Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, Netehrlands, pp. 497-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10530-5.
Kirik, V.A.; Cheng, S.; Vyunova, N.I.; Galustyan, O.V.; Gamisonija, S.S.; Galustyan, S.D. (2021). Education of Future Green Engineers for Achieving Sustainable Development in Green Manufacturing Industry. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 11, 138-145. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v11i5.22165.
Armstrong, L.B.; Rivas, M.C.; Douskey, M.C.; Baranger, A.M. (2018). Teaching students the complexity of green chemistry and assessing growth in attitudes and understanding. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 13, 61-67. http://doi/org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.04.003.
Günter, T.; Akkuzu, N.; Alpat, Ş. (2017). Understanding ‘green chemistry’and ‘sustainability’: an example of problem-based learning (PBL). Research in Science and Technological Education, 35, 500-520. http://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1353964.
Karpudewan, M.; Hj Ismail, Z.; Mohamed, N. (2011). Greening a chemistry teaching methods course at the School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 5, 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F097340821100500210.
Kennedy, S.A. (2016). Design of a dynamic undergraduate green chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 93, 645-649. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00432.
Wang, M.-Y.; Li, X.-Y.; He, L.-N. (2018). Green chemistry education and activity in China. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 13, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.07.001.
Bonwell, C.; Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report; ERIC Publication: Washington DC, USA.
Theobald, E.J.; Hill, M.J.; Tran, E.; Agrawal, S.; Arroyo, E.N.; Behling, S.; Chambwe, N.; Cintrón, D.L.; Cooper, J.D.; Dunster, G.; et al. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117, 6476-6483. http://doi/org/doi:10.1073/pnas.1916903117.
Owens, D.C.; Barlow, A.T.; Smith-Walters, C. (2020). Student Motivation and Resistance in Active Learning Classrooms. In Active Learning in College Science: The Case for Evidence-Based Practice, Mintzes, J.J., Walter, E.M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, pp. 927-942. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_57.
Owens, D.C.; Sadler, T.D.; Barlow, A.T.; Smith-Walters, C. (2020). Student Motivation from and Resistance to Active Learning Rooted in Essential Science Practices. Research in Science Education, 50, 253-277. http://doi/org/10.1007/s11165-017-9688-1.
Hulleman, C.S.; Harackiewicz, J.M. (2009). Promoting Interest and Performance in High School Science Classes. Science, 326, 1410-1412. http://doi/org/doi:10.1126/science.1177067.
Baviskar, S.N.; Hartle, R.T.; Whitney, T. (2009). Essential Criteria to Characterize Constructivist Teaching: Derived from a review of the literature and applied to five constructivistteaching method articles. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701731121.
Colburn, A. (2000). Constructivism: Science education's “grand unifying theory”. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 74, 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2000.11478630.
Piaget, J. (2013). Success and understanding. Routledge: London, United Kingdom.
Gordon, M. (2008). Between constructivism and connectedness. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 322-331. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022487108321379.
Lewis, C.E.; Chen, D.C.; Relan, A. (2018). Implementation of a flipped classroom approach to promote active learning in the third-year surgery clerkship. The American Journal of Surgery, 215, 298-303. http://doi/org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.050.
Freeman, S.; Eddy, S.L.; McDonough, M.; Smith, M.K.; Okoroafor, N.; Jordt, H.; Wenderoth, M.P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
Lund, T.J.; Stains, M. (2015). The importance of context: an exploration of factors influencing the adoption of student-centered teaching among chemistry, biology, and physics faculty. International Journal of STEM Education: 2, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0026-8.
Tharayil, S.; Borrego, M.; Prince, M.; Nguyen, K.A.; Shekhar, P.; Finelli, C.J.; Waters, C. (2018). Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 7. http://doi/org/10.1186/s40594-018-0102-y.
Downing, N. (2019). The Five-minute Exercise: A Method for Using Modified Lectures in the Legal Research Classroom. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 38, 1-29. http://doi/org/10.1080/0270319X.2019.1614365.
Bierema, L.L. (2019). Incorporating Active Learning into Your Educational Repertoire. In Connecting Adult Learning and Knowledge Management: Strategies for Learning and Change in Higher Education and Organizations, Fedeli, M., Bierema, L.L., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, pp. 27-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29872-2_2.
Penner, J.G. (1984) Why Many College Teachers Cannot Lecture: How to Avoid Communication Breakdown in the ClassroomERIC Publication: Washington DC, USA.
Lenoir, D.; Schramm, K.-W.; Lalah, J.O. (2020). Green Chemistry: Some important forerunners and current issues. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 18, 100313. http://doi/org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2020.100313.
Garner, N.; Huwer, J.; Siol, A.; Hempelmann, R.; Eilks, I. (2015). On the Development of Non-formal Learning Environments for Secondary School Students Focusing on Sustainability and Green Chemistry. In Worldwide Trends in Green Chemistry Education, Zuin, V.G., Mammino, L, Eds; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, United Kingdom, pp. 76-92. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781782621942-00076.
Andraos, J.; Dicks, A.P. (2015). The State of Green Chemistry Instruction at Canadian Universities. In Worldwide Trends in Green Chemistry Education, Zuin, V.G., Mammino, L, Eds; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, United Kingdom; pp. 179-212. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781782621942-00179.
Mitra, M.; Nagchaudhuri, A.; Xavier Henry, M.S. (2016). Sustainability in BioEnergy Academy for Teachers (BEAT): Changing Perspectives and Practices Toward “Greening” the Curricula. In New Developments in Engineering Education for Sustainable Development, Leal Filho, W., Nesbit, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2016; pp. 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32933-8_17.
Lee, N.E.; Gurney, R.; Soltzberg, L. (2014). Using Green Chemistry Principles As a Framework To Incorporate Research into the Organic Laboratory Curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 1001-1008. http://doi/org/10.1021/ed300283y.
Brydges, S. (2016). Chemistry in Context: Integrating Chemical Information Literacy, Scientific Writing, and Contemporary Issues in the First-Year Undergraduate Curriculum. In Integrating Information Literacy into the Chemistry Curriculum; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, United States, Volume 1232, pp. 105-120. http://doi/org/10.1021/bk-2016-1232.ch005.
Fenner, R.A.; Ainger, C.M.; Cruickshank, H.J.; Guthrie, P.M. (2005). Embedding sustainable development at Cambridge University Engineering Department. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6, 229-241. http://doi/org/10.1108/14676370510607205.
Glavič, P.; Lukman, R.; Lozano, R. (2009). Engineering education: environmental and chemical engineering or technology curricula – a European perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34, 47-61. http://doi/org/10.1080/03043790802710193.
Shaeiwitz, J.A. (1996). Outcomes Assessment in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 85, 239-246. http://doi/org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00239.x.
SUBMITTED: 22 April 2022
ACCEPTED: 12 June 2022
PUBLISHED:
16 June 2022
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 51 days
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v1i1.87