Gamification to Improve Participation in an Environmental Science Course: An Educator’s Reflection

Kuok Ho Daniel Tang

doi:10.53623/apga.v2i2.192

Reticence prevalent among East Asian students has prompted educators to attempt different methods to engage them. Gamification of courses has gained popularity as an avenue to encourage students’ participation, and it is facilitated by the roll-out of diverse online gamification platforms. This study aims to reflect on an educator’s experience of incorporating elements of gamification in an environmental science course delivered in a micro-campus established through a Sino-American educational collaboration. Gibb’s Reflective Cycle was adopted to guide the reflection practice. Gamification was implemented with three online interactive platforms, namely Poll Everywhere, Kahoot, and Quizizz. Poll Everywhere was mainly used for short polls and activities during lessons, while Kahoot and Quizizz were used for quiz-like competitions whose scores did not contribute to students’ grades. Kahoot created a lively atmosphere in class but was constrained by limits on players’ numbers, internet control, and the lag between sending and receiving responses. Quizizz had more game elements, which thrilled individual players but was less able to create the lively classroom the educator desired. It was more stable, perhaps because it was less subjected to internet control. Poll Everywhere had a less attractive scoreboard and was more appropriate for short classroom activities. Students' interest in the platforms tended to wane with each repeated use of the platforms. To improve the gamification experience, a mix of platforms could be used, and locally developed platforms could be sourced for stability and diversification.

Read Full-Text

Previous article

Next article

References

Takahashi, J. (2019). East Asian and native-English-speaking students’ participation in the graduate-level American classroom. Communication Education, 68, 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2019.1566963.

Liu, M.; Jackson, J. (2011). Reticence and Anxiety in Oral English Lessons: A Case Study in China. In Researching Chinese Learners: Skills, Perceptions and Intercultural Adaptations; Jin, L., Cortazzi, M., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK., pp. 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299481_6.

Wu, H. (2019). Reticence in the EFL classroom: voices from students in a Chinese university. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 8, 114–125. http://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.8n.6p.114.

Fang-yu, C. (2011). The causes of learners’ reticence and passivity in English classrooms in Taiwan. Journal of Asia TEFL, 8, 1–22.

Kenwright, D.; Dai, W.; Osborne, E.; Gladman, T.; Gallagher, P.; Grainger, R. (2017). Just tell me what I need to know to pass the exam!” can active flipped learning overcome passivity. TAPS, 2(1), 1–6.

Mathé, N.E.H. (2018). Engagement, passivity and detachment: 16-year-old students’ conceptions of politics and the relationship between people and politics. British Educational Research Journal, 44, 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3313.

Shao, Q., & Gao, X. (Andy). (2016). Reticence and willingness to communicate (WTC) of East Asian language learners. System, 63, 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.10.001.

Kennedy, P. (2002). Learning cultures and learning styles: myth-understandings about adult (Hong Kong) Chinese learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21, 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370210156745.

Chanock, K. (2010). The right to reticence. Teaching in Higher Education, 15, 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.491907.

Zhang, L.; Chen, Y. (2021). Examining the Effects of Gamification on Chinese College Students’ Foreign Language Anxiety: A Preliminary Exploration. 2021 4th International Conference on Big Data and Education, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3451400.3451401.

Wang, A.I.; Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review. Computers & Education, 149, 103818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818.

Alsawaier, R.S. (2018). The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(1), 56–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2017-0009.

Bai, S.; Hew, K.F.; Huang, B. (2020). Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts. Educational Research Review, 30, 100322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100322.

Bawa, P. (2018). Using Kahoot to Inspire. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47, 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239518804173.

Antonaci, A.; Klemke, R.; Specht, M. (2019). The Effects of Gamification in Online Learning Environments: A Systematic Literature Review. In Informatics (Vol. 6, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics6030032.

Chen, Y.-M. (2022). Understanding foreign language learners’ perceptions of teachers’ practice with educational technology with specific reference to Kahoot! and Padlet: A case from China. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 1439–1465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10649-2.

Tang, K.H.D. (2021). Controversies of The Post-Lockdown New Normal - It May Not be Entirely Normal. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4, 7-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CRJSSH.4.1.02.

Tang, K.H.D. (2021). From Movement Control to National Recovery Plan: Malaysia’s Strategy to Live with COVID-19. International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research, 6, 286–292. http://doi.org/10.52403/ijshr.20211040.

Wang, F.; Wang, Y.; Hu, X. (2017). Gamification Teaching Reform for Higher Vocational Education in China: A Case Study on Layout and Management of Distribution Center. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12, 130–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12.i09.7493.

Rawendy, D.; Ying, Y.; Arifin, Y.; Rosalin, K. (2017). Design and Development Game Chinese Language Learning with Gamification and Using Mnemonic Method. Procedia Computer Science, 116, 61–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.009.

Zhang, Q.; Yu, Z. (2021). A literature review on the influence of Kahoot! On learning outcomes, interaction, and collaboration. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4507–4535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10459-6.

Girardelli, D. (2017). Impromptu speech gamification for ESL/EFL students. Communication Teacher, 31, 156–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2017.1314522.

Ho, J. (2020). Gamifying the flipped classroom: how to motivate Chinese ESL learners? Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1614185.

Tang, K.H.D. (2022). Climate change education in China: a pioneering case of its implementation in tertiary education and its effects on students’ beliefs and attitudes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2022-0151.

Tang, K.H.D. (2020). Personality traits, teamwork competencies and academic performance among first-year engineering students. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-11-2019-0153.

Tang, K.H.D. (2022). A model of behavioral climate change education for higher educational institutions. Environmental Advances, 9, 100305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100305.

Basuki, Y.; Hidayati, Y. (2019). Kahoot! or Quizizz: The students’ perspectives. Proceedings of the 3rd English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC), 27th April 2019, Semarang, Indonesia. http://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-4-2019.2285331.

Kappers, W.M.; Cutler, S.L. (2015). Poll Everywhere! Even in the classroom: An investigation into the impact of using PollEverwhere in a large-lecture classroom. Computers in Education Journal, 6, 21. http://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22921.

Tang, K.H.D. (2022). Reflection of an Online Climate Change Course and Its Pedagogies: Retrospection and Prospect. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 2, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v2i1.104.

Adeani, I.S.; Febriani, R.B.; Syafryadin, S. (2020). Using Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle in Making Reflections of Literary Analysis. Indonesian EFL Journal, 6, 139–148. http://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v6i2.3382.

Tang, D.K.H. (2021). A Case Study of Outcome-based Education: Reflecting on Specific Practices between a Malaysian Engineering Program and a Chinese Science Program. Innovative Teaching and Learning, 3, 86–104.

Tang, K.H.D. (2021). Engaging Students in the Development of an Atmospheric Science Course: A Discourse Analysis. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 19, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2021/v19i330463.

Zou, D. (2020). Gamified flipped EFL classroom for primary education: student and teacher perceptions. Journal of Computers in Education, 7, 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00153-w.

Tang, K.H.D. (2022). Impacts of COVID-19 on primary, secondary and tertiary education: a comprehensive review and recommendations for educational practices. Educational Research for Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-022-09319-y.

Jones, E.P.; Wisniewski, C.S. (2019). Gamification of a Mobile Applications Lecture in a Pharmacy Course. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 38, 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2019.1657728.

Read Full-Text

About this article

SUBMITTED: 15 January 2023
ACCEPTED: 24 January 2023
PUBLISHED: 1 February 2023
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 10 days
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v2i2.192

Cite this article

Tang, K. H. D. (2023). Gamification to Improve Participation in an Environmental Science Course: An Educator’s Reflection. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 2(2), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v2i2.192

Keywords

engage gamification Kahoot Poll Everywhere Quizizz reticence

Accessed

1029

Citations

Share this article

Gamification to Improve Participation in an Environmental Science Course: An Educator’s Reflection

Acta Pedagogia Asiana

Volume 2 - Issue 2 - 2023

Abstract

References