This study aimed to determine the efficiency of media pollutant removal from municipal wastewater with high concentrations of ammonia and phosphorus in constructed wetlands (CWs). The study utilized secondary data from previous studies that were published in credible sources. The removal efficiencies of the five media used in the constructed wetland, namely, peat-cattails, cattails, peat, Viteveria zizanioides, and Phragmite karka, were compared. The results showed that CWs with Viteveria zizaniode exhibited the best performance on average, removing 84% nitrogen and 86% phosphorus. Peat was also effective in attenuating pH. Humic and fulvic acids in peat moss can be released quickly in an aqueous environment under alkaline conditions, effectively lowering the pH value. The combination of Viteveria zizaniode and peat significantly improved pollutant removal efficiency in municipal wastewater with high concentrations of ammonia and phosphorus.
Ngeno, E.C.; Mbuci, K.E.; Necibi, M.C.; Shikuku, V.O.; Olisah, C.; Ongulu, R.; Matovu, H.; Ssebugere, P.; Abushaban, A.; Sillanpää, M. (2022). Sustainable re-utilization of waste materials as adsorbents for water and wastewater treatment in Africa: recent studies, research gaps, and way forward for emerging economies. Environmental Advances, 100282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100282.
Myers, D.N. (2015). Foundations of water quality monitoring and assessment in the United States. Food, Energy, and Water, 21‒92. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800211-7.00002-8.
Chang, C.C.; Wei, L.; Cui, Y.; Dong, Z.; You, S-H. (2015). Stream, Lake, and Reservoir Management. Water Environment Research, 87, 1515‒1550. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143015X14338845156146 .
Udaiyappan, A.F.M.; Hasan, H.A.; Takriff, M.S.; Abdullah, S.R.S. (2017). A review of the potentials, challenges and current status of microalgae biomass applications in industrial wastewater treatment. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 20, 8‒21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.09.006.
Kang, W.; Chai, H.; Xiang, Y.; Chen, W.; Shao, Z.; He, Q. (2017). Assessment of low concentration wastewater treatment operations with dewatered alum sludge-based sequencing batch constructed wetland system. Scientific Reports, 7, 17497. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17783-3.
Almuktar, S.A.; Abed, S.N.; Scholz, M. (2018). Wetlands for wastewater treatment and subsequent recycling of treated effluent: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 23595‒23623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2629-3.
Hdidou, M.; Necibi, M.C.; Labille, J.; Hajjaji, S.E.; Dhiba, D.; Chehbouni, A.; Roche, N. (2021). Potential use of constructed wetland systems for rural sanitation and wastewater reuse in agriculture in the Moroccan context. Energies, 15, 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010156.
Cao, Z.; Zhou, L.; Gao, Z.; Huang, Z.; Jio, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, K.; Di, Z.; Bai, Y. (2021). Comprehensive benefits assessment of using recycled concrete aggregates as the substrate in constructed wetland polishing effluent from wastewater treatment plant. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, 125551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125551.
Ávila, C.; García, J. (2015). Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the environment and their removal from wastewater through constructed wetlands. Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry, 67, 195‒244. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63299-9.00006-5.
Gholipour, A.; Stefanakis, A.I. (2021). A full-scale anaerobic baffled reactor and hybrid constructed wetland for university dormitory wastewater treatment and reuse in an arid and warm climate. Ecological Engineering, 170, 106360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106360.
Ge, Z.; Wei, D. Zhang, J.; Hu, J.; Liu, Z. (2019). Natural pyrite to enhance simultaneous long-term nitrogen and phosphorus removal in constructed wetland: Three years of pilot study. Water Research, 148, 153‒161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.037.
Shen, S.; Li, X.; Cheng, F.; Zha, X.; Lu, X. (2020). Recent developments of substrates for nitrogen and phosphorus removal in CWs treating municipal wastewater. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 29837‒29855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08808-y.
Hu, X.; Xie, H.; Zhuang, L.; Zhang, J.; Hu, Z.; Liang, S.; Feng, K. (2021). A review on the role of plant in pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) removal in constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment, 780, 146637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146637.
Brix, H. (2020). Wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands: system design, removal processes, and treatment performance. In CWs for water quality improvement, 1st ed.; Moshiri, G.A., Ed.: CRC Press: Boca Raton, USA, pp. 9‒22.
Priya, A.K.; Pachaiappan, R.; Kumar, P.S.; Jalil, A.A.; Vo, D.V.N.; Rajendran, S. (2021). The war using microbes: A sustainable approach for wastewater management. Environmental Pollution, 275, 116598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116598.
Duan, J.; Feng, Y.; Yu, Y.; He, S.; Xue, L.; Yang, L. (2016). Differences in the treatment efficiency of a cold-resistant floating bed plant receiving two types of low-pollution wastewater. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188, 1‒11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5286-3.
Ng, Y.S.; Chan, D.J.C. (2017). Wastewater phytoremediation by Salvinia molesta. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 15, 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.08.006.
Wu, H.; Zhang, J.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.; Hu, Z.; Liang, S.; Fan, J.; Liu, H. (2015) A review on the sustainability of CWs for wastewater treatment: design and operation. Bioresource Technology, 175, 594‒601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.068.
Sandoval, L.; Castro, S.A.Z.; Álvarez, M.V.; Muñiz, J.L.M. (2019). Role of wetland plants and use of ornamental flowering plants in CWs for wastewater treatment: A review. Applied Sciences, 9, 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9040685.
Saumya, S.; Akansha, S.; Rinaldo, J.; Jayasri, M.A.; Suthindhiran, K. (2015). Construction and evaluation of prototype subsurface flow wetland planted with Heliconia angusta for the treatment of synthetic greywater. Journal of Cleaner Production, 91, 235‒240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.019.
Temel, F.A.; Özyazıcı, G.; Uslu, V.R.; Ardalı, Y. (2018). Full scale subsurface flow CWs for domestic wastewater treatment: 3 years' experience. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 37, 1348‒1360. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12908.
Valipour, A.; Ahn, Y.-H. (2017). A review and perspective of CWs as a green technology in decentralization practices. Green Technologies and Environmental Sustainability, 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50654-8_1.
Salimi, S.; Almuktar, S.A.A.A.N.; Scholz, M. (2021). Impact of climate change on wetland ecosystems: A critical review of experimental wetlands. Journal of Environmental Management, 286, 112160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112160.
Kataki, S.; Chatterjee, S.; Vairale, M.G.; Sharma, S.; Dwivedi, S.K.; Gupta, D.K. (2021). Constructed wetland, an eco-technology for wastewater treatment: A review on various aspects of microbial fuel cell integration, low temperature strategies and life cycle impact of the technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 148, 111261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111261.
Bai, X.; Zhu, X.; Jiang, H.; Wang, Z.; He, C.; Sheng, L.; Zhuang, J. (2020). Purification effect of sequential constructed wetland for the polluted water in urban river. Water, 12, 1054. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041054.
Nuel, M.; Laurent, J.; Bois, P.; Heintz, D.; Wanko, A. (2018). Seasonal and ageing effect on the behaviour of 86 drugs in a full-scale surface treatment wetland: Removal efficiencies and distribution in plants and sediments. Science of the Total Environment, 615, 1099‒1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.061.
Ingrao, C.; Failla, S.; Arcidiacono, C. (2020). A comprehensive review of environmental and operational issues of constructed wetland systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 13, 35‒45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2019.10.007.
Hajinajaf, N.; Mehrabadi, A.; Tavakoli, O. (2021). Practical strategies to improve harvestable biomass energy yield in microalgal culture: A review. Biomass and Bioenergy, 145, 105941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105941.
Cantera, S.; Fischer, P.Q.; Andrea, I.S.; Marín, D.; Sousa, D.Z.; Muñoz, R. (2021). Impact of the algal-bacterial community structure, physio-types and biological and environmental interactions on the performance of a high rate algal pond treating biogas and wastewater. Fuel, 302, 121148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121148.
Mousavi, S.A.; Ibrahim, S.; Aroua, M.K. (2017). Effect of carbon source on acclimatization of nitrifying bacteria to achieve high-rate partial nitrification of wastewater with high ammonium concentration. Applied Water Science, 7, 165‒173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-014-0229-z.
Akizuki, S.; Cuevas-Rodríguez, G.; Toda, T. (2019). Microalgal-nitrifying bacterial consortium for energy-saving ammonia removal from anaerobic digestate of slaughterhouse wastewater. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 31, 100753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.01.014.
Hua, T.; Haynes, R.J.; Zhao, Y.-F.; Boullemant, A.; Chandrawana, I. (2015). Potential for use of industrial waste materials as filter media for removal of Al, Mo, As, V and Ga from alkaline drainage in constructed wetlands–adsorption studies. Water Research, 71, 32‒41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.12.036.
Faulkner, S.P.; Richardson, C.J. (1989). Physical and chemical characteristics of freshwater wetland soils. In Constructed Wetlands for wastewater treatment, 1st. ed.; Hammer, D.A., Ed.; CRS Press: Boca Raton, USA, pp. 41‒72.
Smyth, K.; Vendramelli, R.; Dankewich, D.; Yuan, Q. (2018). Seasonal variations in cold climate nutrient removal: A comparison of facultative and aerated lagoons. Journal of Environmental Management, 214, 224‒231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.098.
Aldmour, S.T.; Burke, I.T.; Bray, A.W.; Baker, D.L.; Ross, A.B.; Gill, F.L.; Cibin, G.; Ries, M.E.; Stewart, D.I. (2019). Abiotic reduction of Cr (VI) by humic acids derived from peat and lignite: kinetics and removal mechanism. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 4717‒4729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3902-1.
Shvartseva, O.; Skripkina, T.; Gaskova, O.; Podgorbunskikh, E. (2022). Modification of Natural Peat for Removal of Copper Ions from Aqueous Solutions. Water, 14, 2114. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14132114.
Rahman, J.A.; Mohamed, R.M.S.R.; Durahim, N.H.A.; Tajuddin, S.A.; Al-Gheethi, A.A.S. (2022). Mathematical Modelling and Simulation of Chemical and Biological Reaction in Peat Solidification Work for Environmental Sustainability. Earth Systems Protection and Sustainability, 2, 127‒155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98584-4_5.
Jinadasa, K.; Meetiyagoda, T.; Ng, W.J. (2018). Solid Waste (SW) Leachate Treatment using Constructed Wetland Systems. Constructed Wetlands for Industrial Wastewater Treatment, 263‒282. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119268376.ch13.
Weigelhofer, G.; Hein, T.; Bondar-Kunze, E. (2018). Phosphorus and nitrogen dynamics in riverine systems: Human impacts and management options. In Riverine Ecosystem Management; Schmutz, S., Sendzimir, J., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, Vol 8, p. 187. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73250-3_10.
Esfandbod, M.; Phillips,I.R.; Miller, B.; Rashti, M.R.; Lan, Z.M.; Srivastava, P.; Singh, B.; Chen, C.R. (2017). Aged acidic biochar increases nitrogen retention and decreases ammonia volatilization in alkaline bauxite residue sand. Ecological Engineering, 98, 157‒165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.077.
Liu, S.; Chi, Q.; Shan, J.; Zhu, B.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, Y.; Cai, Z.; Zhang, J.; Yan, X.; Müller, C. (2020). Evaluation of the effectiveness of N process inhibitors in paddy rice via a 15N tracing approach. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 147, 107855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107855.
Si, Z.; Song, X.; Cao, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Ge, X.; Tesfahunegn, A.A. (2020). Nitrate removal to its fate in wetland mesocosm filled with sponge iron: Impact of influent COD/N ratio. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14, 1‒9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1183-7.
Carstensen, M.V.; Larsen, S.E.; Kjærgaard, C.; Hoffmann, C.C. (2019). Reducing adverse side effects by seasonally lowering nitrate removal in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Journal of Environmental Management, 240, 190‒197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.081.
Hernández-Crespo, C.; Gargallo, S.; Benedito-Durá, V.; Nácher-Rodríguez, B.; Rodrigo-Alacreu, M.A.; Martín, M. (2017). Performance of surface and subsurface flow CW streating eutrophic waters. Science of the Total Environment, 595, 584‒593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.278.
Behrendt, A.; Tarre, S.; Beliavski, M.; Green, M.; Klatt, J.; Beer, D.d.; Stief, P. (2014). Effect of high electron donor supply on dissimilatory nitrate reduction pathways in a bioreactor for nitrate removal. Bioresource Technology, 171, 291‒297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.073.
Chen, X.; Chen, G.; Wang, Z.; Ren, N.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y. (2018). Nitrogen recovery from wastewater using anammox process: A review. Bioresource Technology, 247, 1144‒1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.008.
Räsänen, N.H.; Kankaala, P.; Akkanen, J.; Tahvanainen, T.; Saarnio, S. (2016). Effects of mire-originated dissolved organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus on microbial activity in boreal headwaters. Inland Waters, 6, 65‒76.
Shen, S.; Ma, T.; Yao, D.; Kewen, L.; Yamin, D.; Lu, Z. (2019). Temporal variations in groundwater nitrogen under intensive groundwater/surface-water interaction. Hydrogeology Journal, 27, 1753‒1766.
Vymazal, J. (2005). Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid CWs systems for wastewater treatment. Ecological Engineering, 25, 478-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.010.
Xia, H.; Ke, H.; Deng, Z.; Tan, P.; Liu, S. (2003). Ecological effectiveness of vetiver CWsin treating oil-refined wastewater. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Vetiver and Exhibition, Guangzhou, China, 20 August 2001.
Stottmeister, U.; Wießner, A.; Kuschk, P.; Kappelmeyer, U.; Kästner, M.; Bederski, O.; Müller, R.A.; Moormann, H. (2003). Effects of plants and microorganisms in CWs for wastewater treatment. Biotechnology Advances, 22, 93‒117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2003.08.010.
Munir, M.; Rehman, R.U.; Qazi, J.I.; Riaz, M.; Yasin, M. (2019). Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: a review of recent developments, limitations, and future directions. Water Environment Research, 91, 944‒960. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1166.
Dhanya, G.; Jaya, D. (2013). Pollutant removal in wastewater by Vetiver grass in constructed wetland system. International Journal of Engineering, 2, 1361‒1368.
Lai, D.Y. (2014). Phosphorus fractions and fluxes in the soils of a free surface flow constructed wetland in Hong Kong. Ecological Engineering, 73, 73‒79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.004.
Wang, X.; Zheng, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, M.; Li, H. (2018). Phosphorus removal in constructed wetlands: A review on research progress and limitation. Science of the Total Environment, 631-632, 1182‒1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.091.
Jin, M.; Champagne, P.; Hall, G. (2017). Effects of different substrates in the mitigation of algae-induced high pH wastewaters in a pilot-scale free water surface wetland system. Water Science and Technology, 75, 1‒10. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.401.
Ciria, M.; Solano, M.; Soriano, P. (2005). Role of macrophyte Typha latifolia in a constructed wetland for wastewater treatment and assessment of its potential as a biomass fuel. Biosystems Engineering, 92, 535‒544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.08.007.
Rahman, M.S.; Sathasivan, A.; Kormi, T. A. (2021). Effect of plant species and influent loading rate on nutrient removal from municipal wastewater in a vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland. Environmental Technology, 42, 839‒852. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2020.1776237.
Kassa, Y.; Mengistou, S. (2014). Nutrient uptake efficiency and growth of two aquatic macrophyte species under constructed wetlands, Ethiopia. SINET: Ethiopian Journal of Science, 37, 95‒104.
Vocciante, M.; Grifoni, M.; Fusini, D.; Petruzzelli, G.; Franchi, E. (2022). The role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in mitigating plant’s environmental stresses. Applied Sciences, 12, 1231. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031231.
Anderson, T.A.; Coats. J.R. (1994). Bioremediation through rhizosphere technology, 1st. ed.; American Chemical Society: Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Liang, J.; Tang, S.; Gong, J.; Zeng, G.; Tang, W.; Song, B.; Zhang, P.; Yang, Z.; Luo, Y. (2020). Responses of enzymatic activity and microbial communities to biochar/compost amendment in sulfamethoxazole polluted wetland soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 385, 121533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121533.
Adcock, P.; Ganf, G. (1994). Growth characteristics of three macrophyte species growing in a natural and constructed wetland system. Water Science and Technology, 29, 95‒102. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1994.0166.
SUBMITTED: 19 February 2023
ACCEPTED: 01 April 2023
PUBLISHED:
5 April 2023
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 41 days
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53623/tasp.v3i1.214