Design of Automatic Candy Mixer using Blynk and NodeMCU ESP8266

Candy has many variations based on shape, texture, and taste. The more variations of the product have an effect on more consumers, Candy products also have a lot of variety, which makes mixing candy an interesting task. The mixing process of candies is usually done by weighting them manually with conventional scales, so there are some deficiencies to be improved. The automatic candy mixer using Blynk and NodeMCU ESP8266 has been designed to be able to help with the process of mixing and weighting candy automatically. This device allows users to choose weight and candy types to be mixed, whether it is one type of candy or more, from the Blynk application and is operated using a microcontroller and sensor. The utilized sensor is a load cell sensor with 1% of calibration inaccuracy.

Previous article

Next article

© 2022 Hugeng Hugeng, Khefin Khefin, Meirista Wulandari. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Share and Cite

ACS Styles

APA Styles

Hugeng, H., Khefin, K., & Wulandari, M. (2022). Design of Automatic Candy Mixer using Blynk and NodeMCU ESP8266. Green Intelligent Systems and Applications, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.53623/gisa.v2i1.59

MLA Styles

Find Other Styles

References

Delarosa, M.; Dharmesti, D.; Nugroho, S.S. (2013). The Antecedents of online customer satisfaction and customer loyalty. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 7, 2. https://doi.org/10.24052/JBRMR/123.

Das, D.G.J.; Midha, K.; Kushwaha, O.S. (2021). IRJET- Automatic Weighing and Packaging Machine for Small Scale Industries and Grocery Stores. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6, 2129-2138.

Hambir, P.; Joshi, N.; Karande, P.; Kolhe, A. (2019). Automatic Weighing and Packaging Machine. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6, 2131–2138.

Guin, P.; Roy, A. (2016). Design of efficient loadcell for measurement of mechanical impact by piezoelectric PVDF film sensor. AIP Advances, 6, 095122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4964148.

Durani, H.; Sheth, M.; Vaghasia, M.; Kotech, S. (2018). Smart Automated Home Application using IoT with Blynk App. 2018 Second International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT), 393–397. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICCT.2018.8473224.

Ginting, S.; Simatupang, J.W.; Bukhori, I.; Kaburuan, E.R. (2018). Monitoring of electrical output power-based internet of things for micro-hydro power plant. 2018 International Conference on Orange Technologies (ICOT), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOT.2018.8705786.

Dhanalakshmi, S.; Poongothai, M.; Sharma, K. (2020). IoT Based Indoor Air Quality and Smart Energy Management for HVAC System. Procedia Computer Science, 171, 1800–1809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.193.

Barai, S.; Biswas, D.; Sau, B. (2018). Estimate distance measurement using NodeMCU ESP8266 based on RSSI technique. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Antenna Measurements & Application CAMA, 2, 170–173. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAMA.2017.8273392.

Mesquita, J.; Guimaraes, D.; Pereira, C.; Santos, F.; Almeida, L. (2018). Assessing the ESP8266 WiFi module for the Internet of Things. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), 784–791. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2018.8502562.

Shende, A.P.; Anande, R.S. (2019). Motion Imitation Robotic Arm, (MIRA). International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6, 352-358.

Aprilyana, G.; Setioningsih, E.D.; Triwiyanto, T. (2019). Design of Force Meter for Traction Unit. Indonesian Journal of Electronics Electromedical Engineering and Medical Informatics, 1, 57–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.35882/ijeeemi.v1i2.2.

Article Metrics

For more information on the journal statistics, click here.

The following definitions may be helpful to you for understanding the variety of statistics tracked by this journal.

Page view: the landing page for an article, containing the title, author information, abstract, DOI, and links to any article full-text galleys. Also known as the “article page” or “landing page.” This page is normally used as the point of record for the article for DOIs or other hyperlinks: Crossref DOIs resolve to article abstract pages, as opposed to galley files, for example, as would most other indexing services.
Article view: within the statistics framework, any reference to an “article view” means a single unique view of the article abstract page by a visitor. This is not an aggregate count of all article and file downloads - it refers to abstract views only.
Article download: within the statistics framework, any reference to a “article download” means a single unique view or download of the a specific file by a visitor.
Multi-clicks: the process (accidental or nefarious) of increasing usage counts by clicking on an abstract page or download file multiple times in quick succession. We identify and remove these attempts from its usage metrics, as per the Project COUNTER Code of Practice.
Project COUNTER Code of Practice: a set of practices developed by COUNTER to establish a means to report on usage metrics for electronic resources in a consistent way. The Code provides rules on what should be counted as a view, including specific rules for robot usage and multi-click abuse. We filter metrics through these rules.
Robots, crawlers, bots: nonhuman site visitors who may still view and download article data. These are usually identified as such to the server, and we do not count them in its usage metrics, as per the Project COUNTER Code of Practice.

Article ID 59

Article Menu

Article Menu

Article Overview

Article Overview

Related Info Links

More by Authors Links

on DOAJ

on Google Scholar