Shopping is one of the economic activities enjoyed by most people. Interest in new items is always a long-anticipated part of shopping. The growth of global industry and the disappearance of national borders have made a lot of information about shopping centers available, particularly through an online shopping application called TikTok Shop. As a new application, TikTok Shop has attracted the attention of its users, resulting in many requests being made through TikTok Shop. Using a qualitative approach, researchers describe people's habits by interviewing them about their use of TikTok Shop and what aspects satisfy them when shopping on TikTok Shop. By employing qualitative methodology and interviews, the researchers aim to understand why people use TikTok Shop nowadays. The results show that TikTok Shop is considered to meet users' wants and needs, providing satisfaction through discounts, live shows, and other minor features described in this article. The conclusion is that shoppers are likely to increasingly turn to TikTok Shop over the next few years, making it a favorite shopping tool.
A. Alley and J. Hanshew, “A long article about short videos: A content analysis of U.S. academic libraries’ use of TikTok,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 48, no. 6, p. 102611, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102611.
V. Hase, K. Boczek, and M. Scharkow, “Adapting to Affordances and Audiences? A Cross-Platform, Multi-Modal Analysis of the Platformization of News on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter,” Digital Journalism, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1499–1520, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1080/21670811.2022.2128389.
M. Boeker and A. Urman, “An Empirical Investigation of Personalization Factors on TikTok,” in Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Apr. 2022, pp. 2298–2309. doi: 10.1145/3485447.3512102.
E. Gil-Cordero, C. Rodriguez-Rad, P. Ledesma-Chaves, and M.-E. Sánchez del Río-Vázquez, “Analysis of factors affecting the effectiveness of face-to-face marketing learning via TikTok, YouTube and video conferencing,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 7, p. e17195, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17195.
P. Jaipong, “Business Model and Strategy : A Case Study Analysis of TikTok,” 2023, [Online]. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4335962
M. Broersma and S. A. Eldridge II, “Journalism and Social Media: Redistribution of Power?,” Media Commun, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 193–197, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.17645/mac.v7i1.2048.
M. Badham and M. Mykkänen, “A Relational Approach to How Media Engage With Their Audiences in Social Media,” Media Commun, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 54–65, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.17645/mac.v10i1.4409.
H. Zhao and C. Wagner, “Factors influencing TikTok-based user purchase intention: comparison between potential customers and repeat customers,” Internet Research, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1108/INTR-07-2022-0542.
K. S. Meng and L. Leung, “Factors influencing TikTok engagement behaviors in China: An examination of gratifications sought, narcissism, and the Big Five personality traits,” Telecomm Policy, vol. 45, no. 7, p. 102172, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102172.
Indrawati, P. C. Putri Yones, and S. Muthaiyah, “eWOM via the TikTok application and its influence on the purchase intention of somethinc products,” Asia Pacific Management Review, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 174–184, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.07.007.
L. Nusbaum, B. Douglas, K. Damus, M. Paasche-Orlow, and N. Estrella-Luna, “Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study,” Glob Qual Nurs Res, vol. 4, p. 233339361773201, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1177/2333393617732017.
M. E. Aksoy, “A Qualitative Study on the Reasons for Social Media Addiction,” European Journal of Educational Research, vol. volume-7-2018, no. volume7-issue4.html, pp. 861–865, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.861.
I. Pashchenko, D.-L. Vu, and F. Massacci, “A Qualitative Study of Dependency Management and Its Security Implications,” in Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Oct. 2020, pp. 1513–1531. doi: 10.1145/3372297.3417232.
M. D. Vagle, C. H. Clements, and A. C. Coffee, “Analytic Productions in Post-Intentional Phenomenological Research,” Cult Stud Crit Methodol, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 427–441, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1532708616643983.
S. Oerther, “Analysis methods in hermeneutic phenomenological research: interpretive profiles,” Frontiers of Nursing, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 293–298, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.2478/fon-2020-0038.
I. Tuffour, “A Critical Overview of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: A Contemporary Qualitative Research Approach,” J Healthc Commun, vol. 02, no. 04, 2017, doi: 10.4172/2472-1654.100093.
C. Wentao, “Combination of Uses and Gratification Theory and Mental Accounting Model on Inter-Media Recommender System,” The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 52–58, 2019, doi: 10.25236/FSST.2019.010706.
R. An, “A Uses and Gratification Theory Based Study on the Influence of Extrinsic Motivation, Intrinsic Motivation and Gratification on Consumers’ Behavioral Intention in Webcasting,” Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, vol. 10, no. 4, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.33168/JLISS.2023.0415.
R. Z. Vado, E. Nugroho, and H. A. Nugroho, “Analysis of Mobile TV Acceptance Using The Integration of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Uses and Gratification (U&G) Theory,” 2016.
SUBMITTED: 29 March 2024
ACCEPTED: 15 May 2024
PUBLISHED:
20 May 2024
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 47 days
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53623/jdmc.v4i1.429