Skip to main content
Review | Industrial and Domestic Waste Management | Volume 3 - Issue 1 - 2023 | 38-46 | https://doi.org/10.53623/idwm.v3i1.243
© 2023 by the author(s), and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License

Municipal Wastewater Treatment Technologies in Malaysia: A Short Review

Author(s): Risky Ayu Kristanti 1 , Seng Bunrith 2 , Ravinder Kumar 3 , Abdelrahim Omar Mohamed 4
Author(s) information:
1 Research Center for Oceanograpgy, National Research and Innovation Agency, Pasir Putih I, Ancol, Jakarta, 14430 Indonesia
2 Faculty of Hydrology and Water Resource Engineering, Institute of Technology Cambodia, PO BOX 86, Russian Federation Bvld, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
3 Department of Biotchnology, Ramaiah Institute of Technology, Bangalore, PIN- 560 054. Karnataka, India
4 College of Water and Environmental Engineering, Sudan University of Science & Technology, P.O. Box 352, Khartoum North, 13311, Sudan

Corresponding author

Industrial and Domestic Waste Management

Volume 3 - Issue 1 - 2023

 About the journal
Submit your article

The aim of this study was to evaluate different municipal wastewater treatment technologies for commercial use and develop an optimized system for a case study plant and future plant designs. Municipal wastewater, classified as a low-strength waste stream, can be treated using aerobic and anaerobic reactor systems or a combination of both. Aerobic systems are suitable for low-strength wastewaters, while anaerobic systems are suitable for high-strength wastewaters. Malaysia has actively implemented various wastewater treatment technologies to address the increasing demand for clean water and reduce environmental pollution. Some commonly used technologies in Malaysia include Activated Sludge Process (ASP), Membrane Bioreactor (MBR), and Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR). These technologies show promise in removing emerging pollutants, such as pharmaceuticals and personal care products, which are not effectively eliminated by conventional treatment methods. Additionally, Malaysia could consider investing in renewable energy sources like solar and wind to power wastewater treatment plants, thereby reducing reliance on non-renewable energy and supporting sustainable development. It is also important to emphasize continued public awareness and education initiatives to promote responsible wastewater disposal practices and environmental stewardship.

Read Full-Text
Previous article
Next article

Orjuela-Abril, S.; Torregroza-Espinosa, A.; Duarte-Forero, J. (2023). Innovative Technology Strategies for the Sustainable Development of Self-Produced Energy in the Colombian Industry. Sustainability, 15, 5720. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075720.

De la Torre Bayo, J.J.; Martín Pascual, J.; Torres Rojo, J.C.; Zamorano Toro, M. (2022). Waste to Energy from Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants: A Science Mapping. Sustainability, 14, 16871. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416871.

Koul, B.; Yadav, D.; Singh, S.; Kumar, M.; Song, M. (2022). Insights into the Domestic Wastewater Treatment (DWWT) Regimes: A Review. Water, 14, 3542. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14213542.

Kanafin, Y.N.; Kanafina, D.; Malamis, S.; Katsou, E.; Inglezakis, V.J.; Poulopoulos, S.G.; Arkhangelsky, E. (2021). Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors for Municipal Wastewater Treatment: A Literature Review. Membranes, 11, 967. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11120967.

Shameem, K.S.; Sabumon, P.C. (2023). A Review on the Stability, Sustainability, Storage and Rejuvenation of Aerobic Granular Sludge for Wastewater Treatment. Water, 15, 950. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050950.

Medina, E.; Fonseca, C.R.; Gallego-Alarcón, I.; Morales-Nápoles, O.; Gómez-Albores, M.Á.; Esparza-Soto, M.; Mastachi-Loza, C.A.; García-Pulido, D. (2022). Decision Making Model for Municipal Wastewater Conventional Secondary Treatment with Bayesian Networks. Water, 14, 1231. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14081231.

Ahmed, F.; Johnson, D.; Hashaikeh, R.; Hilal, N. (2023). Barriers to Innovation in Water Treatment. Water, 15, 773. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040773.

Capodaglio, A.G. (2017). Integrated, Decentralized Wastewater Management for Resource Recovery in Rural and Peri-Urban Areas. Resources, 6, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources6020022.

Masoud, A.M.N.; Alfarra, A.; Sorlini, S. (2022). Constructed Wetlands as a Solution for Sustainable Sanitation: A Comprehensive Review on Integrating Climate Change Resilience and Circular Economy. Water, 14, 3232. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14203232.

Kuok, K.; Chiu, P.; Rahman, M.; Bakri, M.; Chin, M. (2022) Effectiveness of Centralized Wastewater Treatment Plant in Removing Emerging Contaminants: A Case Study at Kuching, Malaysia. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 14, 650-663. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2022.149034.

Rahmat, S.; Altowayti, W.A.H.; Othman, N.; Asharuddin, S.M.; Saeed, F.; Basurra, S.; Eisa, T.A.E.; Shahir, S. (2022). Prediction of Wastewater Treatment Plant Performance Using Multivariate Statistical Analysis: A Case Study of a Regional Sewage Treatment Plant in Melaka, Malaysia. Water, 14, 3297. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14203297

Samiotis, G.; Tzelios, D.; Trikoilidou, E.; Koutelias, A.; Amanatidou, E. (2018). Innovative Approach on Aerobic Activated Sludge Process towards more Sustainable Wastewater Treatment. Proceedings, 2, 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2110645.

Nazor, S.M. (2020). The Performance of Conventional Sewage Treatment Plant in Kelantan. Master of Engineering Thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia.

Schwarz, M.; Behnisch, J.; Trippel, J.; Engelhart, M.; Wagner, M. (2021). Oxygen Transfer in Two-Stage Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment Plants. Water, 13, 1964. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13141964.

Khatri, N.; Singh, M.; Pokhriyal, S.; Rene, E.D. (2023). Computational fluid dynamics modelling of primary sludge classification in an activated sludge process based wastewater treatment plant: Simulating the hydrodynamic behaviour and experimental verification of the classification efficiency, Chemical Engineering Journal, 464, 142475, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.142475.

Rahman, T.U.; Roy, H.; Islam, M.R.; Tahmid, M.; Fariha, A.; Mazumder, A.; Tasnim, N.; Pervez, M.N.; Cai, Y.; Naddeo, V.; Islam, M.S. (2023). The Advancement in Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Technology toward Sustainable Industrial Wastewater Management. Membranes, 13, 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020181

Rocco, M.J.; Hafuka, A.; Tsuchiya, T.; Kimura, K. (2023). Efficient Recovery of Organic Matter from Municipal Wastewater by a High-Rate Membrane Bioreactor Equipped with Flat-Sheet Ceramic Membranes. Membranes, 13, 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13030300

Iorhemen, O.T.; Hamza, R.A.; Tay, J.H. (2016). Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Technology for Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation: Membrane Fouling. Membranes, 6, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes6020033.

Sriboonnak, S.; Yanun, A.; Induvesa, P.; Pumas, C.; Duangjan, K.; Rakruam, P.; Nitayavardhana, S.; Sittisom, P.; Wongrueng, A. (2022). Efficiencies of O-MBR and A/O-MBR for Organic Matter Removal from and Trihalomethane Formation Potential Reduction in Domestic Wastewater. Membranes, 12, 761. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12080761.

Khastoo, H.; Hassani, A.H.; Mafigholami, R., Mahmoudkhani, R. (2021). Comparing the performance of the conventional and fixed-bed membrane bioreactors for treating municipal wastewater. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 19, 997-1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00664-3.

Rizkallah. M.; El-Fadel, M.; Saikaly, P.E.; Ayoub, G.M.; Darwiche, N.; Hashisho, J. (2013) Hollow-fiber membrane bioreactor for the treatment of high-strength landfill leachate. Waste Management & Research, 31, 1041-1051. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X13497075.

di Biase, A.; Kowalski, M.S.; Devlin, T.R.; Oleszkiewicz, J.A. (2019). Moving bed biofilm reactor technology in municipal wastewater treatment: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 247, 849-866. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.053.

Boltz, J.P.; Daigger, G.T. (2022). A mobile-organic biofilm process for wastewater treatment. Water and Environmental Research, 94, e10792. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.10792.

Madan, S.; Madan, R.; Hussain, A. (2022). Advancement in biological wastewater treatment using hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR): a review. Applied Water Science, 12, 141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01662-y.

Yang, X.; López-Grimau, V. (2021). Reduction of Cost and Environmental Impact in the Treatment of Textile Wastewater Using a Combined MBBR-MBR System. Membranes, 11, 892. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11110892.

Gupta, B.; Gupta, A.K.; Ghosal, P.S.; Lal, S.; Saidulu, D.; Srivastava, A.; Upadhyay, M. (2022). Recent advances in application of moving bed biofilm reactor for wastewater treatment: Insights into critical operational parameters, modifications, field-scale performance, and sustainable aspects. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 10, 107742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107742.

Chattopadhyay, I.J.R.B.; Usman, T.M.M.; Varjani, S. (2022). Exploring the role of microbial biofilm for industrial effluents treatment. Bioengineered, 13, 6420-6440. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2044250.

Santos, A.D.; Martins, R.C.; Quinta-Ferreira, R.M.; Castro, L.M. (2020). Moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) for dairy wastewater treatment. Energy Reports, 6, 40-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.158.

Wang, S.; Parajuli, S.; Sivalingam, V.; Bakke, R. (2020). Biofilm in Moving Bed Biofilm Process for Wastewater Treatment. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88520.

Khudhair, D.N.; Hosseinzadeh, M.; Zwain, H.M.; Siadatmousavi, S.M.; Majdi, A.; Mojiri, A. Upgrading the MBBR Process to Reduce Excess Sludge Production in Activated Sludge System Treating Sewage. Water, 15, 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15030408.

Ćetković, J.; Knežević, M.; Vujadinović, R.; Tombarević, E.; Grujić, M. Selection of Wastewater Treatment Technology: AHP Method in Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Water, 15, 1645. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15091645.

Yang, X.; López-Grimau, V.; Vilaseca, M.; Crespi, M. (2020). Treatment of Textile Wastewater by CAS, MBR, and MBBR: A Comparative Study from Technical, Economic, and Environmental Perspectives. Water, 12, 1306. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051306.

Read Full-Text
About this article

SUBMITTED: 07 April 2023
ACCEPTED: 14 May 2023
PUBLISHED: 16 May 2023
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 37 days
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53623/idwm.v3i1.243

Cite this article
Kristanti, R. A., Bunrith, S. ., Kumar, R. ., & Mohamed, A. O. . (2023). Municipal Wastewater Treatment Technologies in Malaysia: A Short Review. Industrial and Domestic Waste Management, 3(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.53623/idwm.v3i1.243
Keywords
Activated sludge process membrane bioreactor, moving bed biofilm reactor municipal wastewater
Accessed
2690
Citations
0
Share this article