Skip to main content
Article | Civil and Sustainable Urban Engineering | Volume 6 - Issue 1 - 2026 | 1-15 | https://doi.org/10.53623/csue.v6i1.829
© 2026 by the author(s), and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License

Designing a Holistic Composite Metric for Sustainable Integrated Solid Waste Management: Economic, Social, and Environmental Perspectives

Author(s): Michael Kolawole Oluwanimifise ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1816-7842 , Christopher Osita Anyaeche ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6185-7492/print
Author(s) information:
Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Faculty of Technology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.

Corresponding author

Civil and Sustainable Urban Engineering

Volume 6 - Issue 1 - 2026

 About the journal
Submit your article

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have provided  the opportunity to ensure adequate, safe, and affordable housing and basic services (including sustainable waste management) for all by 2030. A Sustainable Integrated Solid Waste Management System (SISWMS) is defined as one that fits a particular location with its inherent characteristics and peculiarities in line with the SDGs. There is no one-size-fits-all, comprehensive waste management system or metric that worked everywhere in the world indefinitely. Hence, waste management stakeholders worldwide were actively engaged in designing their own versions of the Sustainable Integrated Solid Waste Management Composite Index (SISWMCI) and frameworks that were economically, environmentally, and socially viable. This work aimed to develop a scalable, versatile, holistic, and innovative tool, in the form of a metric, to assess and benchmark solid waste management practices and systems. The proposed SISWMS framework and metric were rooted in the tripod of SDG pillars (economic, social, and environmental domains), interwoven using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) weighting and aggregation methodologies,  applied to 45 indicators across 10 sub-domains. The results indicated a red signal requiring urgent intervention, as the overall performance was 0.46, aggregated from the economic (0.49), social (0.49), and environmental (0.40) performance scores. The proposed metric was expected to serve as a robust and reliable sustainability performance benchmarking and improvement tool for waste management practices at the area, local government, state, and national levels.

Read Full-Text
Previous article
Next article

Additional Files

Kaza, S.; Yao, L.C.; Bhada-Tata, P.; Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. Urban Development. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/30317.

Velis, C. A.; Wilson, D. C.; Gavish, Y.; Grimes, S. M.; Whiteman, A. (2023). Socio-economic development drives solid waste management performance in cities: A global analysis using machine learning. Science of the Total Environment, 872, 161913. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161913.

Zaman, A. U.; Lehmann, S. (2013). The zero waste index: a performance measurement tool for waste management systems in a ‘zero waste city’. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 123–132. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.041.

Suttibak, S.; Nitivattananon, V. (2008). Assessment of factors influencing the performance of solid waste recycling programs. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53(1), 45–56. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.09.004.

Cavicchia, C.; Sarnacchiaro, P.; Vichi, M.; Zaccaria, G. (2024). A model-based ultrametric composite indicator for studying waste management in Italian municipalities. Computational Statistics, 39(1), 21–50. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-023-01333-9.

Deepak, A.; Kumar, D.; Sharma, V. (2021). Developing an effectiveness index for biomedical waste management in Indian states using a composite indicators approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(45), 64014–64029. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13940-4.

Gutierrez-Lopez, J.; McGarvey, R. G.; Noble, J. S.; Hall, D. M.; Costello, C. (2024). Quantification of social metrics for use in optimization: An application to solid waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 480, 144111. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144111.

Milanović, T.; Savić, G.; Martić, M.; Milanović, M.; Petrović, N. (2022). Development of the waste management composite index using the DEA method as a circular economy indicator: the case of European Union countries. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 31(1), 771–784. http://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/139896.

García-Bernabéu, A.; Hilario-Caballero, A.; Pla-Santamaría, D.; Salas-Molina, F. (2020). A process-oriented MCDM approach to construct a circular economy composite index. Sustainability, 12(2), 618. http://doi.org/10.3390/su12020618.

Federal Ministry of Environment (FME). (2020). National policy on solid waste management. Federal Republic of Nigeria. (accessed on 23 October 2025) Available online: https://www.environment.gov.ng/download/national-policy-on-solid-waste-management.

Oluwanimifise, M. K.; Anyaeche, C. O. (2025). A MCDM-LCA cluster analysis-based scenario analysis for a sustainable integrated solid waste management system in Ibadan, South-West Nigeria. ISA Journal of Engineering and Technology (ISAJET), 2(4), 1–16. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17243245.

Anuardo, R. G.; Espuny, M.; Costa, A. C. F.; Oliveira, O. J. (2022). Toward a cleaner and more sustainable world: A framework to develop and improve waste management through organizations, governments, and academia. Heliyon, 8(4). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09225.

Marišová, E.; Fandel, P. (2024). Municipal waste management performance: a focus on Slovakia and its LAU-1 districts. Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings, 46, 65–84. http://doi.org/10.14311/APP.2024.46.0065.

Lee, R. P.; Meyer, B.; Huang, Q.; Voss, R. (2020). Sustainable waste management for zero waste cities in China: potential, challenges, and opportunities. Clean Energy, 4(3), 169–201. http://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkaa013.

Schmidt, S.; Laner, D. (2023). Environmental Waste Utilization score to monitor the performance of waste management systems: A novel indicator applied to case studies in Germany. Resources, Conservation and Recycling Advances, 18, 200160. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200160.

Colivicchi, I.; Fabbri, T.; Lombardi, G. V. (2025). Performance indicators for measuring municipal and national targets: a comprehensive analysis. Waste Management: Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–31. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06423-w.

Vranjanac, Z.; Vasovic, D. M.; Janackovic, G. L. (2023). A novel waste management metric for supporting bio-circular economy: Integration within the WEF nexus framework using the Waste Performance Index. Available at SSRN 5211612. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5211612.

Sun, Y.; Garrido-Baserba, M.; Molinos-Senante, M.; Donikian, N. A.; Poch, M.; Rosso, D. (2020). A composite indicator approach to assess the sustainability and resilience of wastewater management alternatives. Science of the Total Environment, 725, 138286. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138286.

Taelman, S.; Sanjuan-Delmás, D.; Tonini, D.; Dewulf, J. (2020). An operational framework for sustainability assessment, including local to global impacts: Focus on waste management systems. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162, 104964. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104964.

Hossein, A. H.; AzariJafari, H.; Khoshnazar, R. (2022). The role of performance metrics in comparative LCA of concrete mixtures incorporating solid wastes: A critical review and guideline proposal. Waste Management, 140, 40–54. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.01.010.

Tasdemir, C.; Gazo, R.; Quesada, H. J. (2020). Sustainability benchmarking tool (SBT): theoretical and conceptual model proposition of a composite framework. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(7), 6755–6797. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00512-3.

Ishizaka, A.; Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336–14345. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143.

Madzík, P.; Falát, L. (2022). State-of-the-art on analytic hierarchy process in the last 40 years: Literature review based on Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modeling. PLOS ONE, 17(5), e0268777. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268777.

Jamwal, A.; Agrawal, R.; Sharma, M.; Kumar, V. (2021). Review of multi-criteria decision analysis in sustainable manufacturing decision making. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 14(3), 202–225. http://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2020.1866708.

Namin, F. S.; Ghadi, A.; Saki, F. (2022). A literature review of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) towards mining method selection (MMS). Resources Policy, 77, 102676. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102676.

Canco, I.; Kruja, D.; Iancu, T. (2021). AHP, a reliable method for quality decision making: A case study in business. Sustainability, 13(24), 13932. http://doi.org/10.3390/su132413932.

Magrini, C.; Degli Esposti, A.; De Marco, E.; Bonoli, A. (2021). Evolution of the urban waste management system in the Emilia-Romagna region. Detritus, 15, 152–166. http://doi.org/10.31025/2611-4135/2021.14085.

Popoola et al. (2016). Assessment of solid waste management in Ibadan North, Oyo state using geo-spatial techniques. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 9(6), 666–679. http://doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v9i6.1.

Solomon et al. (2021). Evaluation of infrastructure in Ibadan metropolis, Nigeria. Ghana Journal of Geography, 13(1), 81–102. http://doi.org/10.4314/gjg.v13i1.5.

Liu, Y.; Lin, R.; Ren, J. (2021). Developing a life cycle composite footprint index for sustainability prioritization of sludge-to-energy alternatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 124885. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124885.

Okot-Okumu, J. (2012). Solid Waste Management in African Cities—East Africa, Waste Management—An Integrated Vision. InTech. http://doi.org/10.5772/50241.

Morrissey, A. J.; Browne, J. (2004). Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management. Waste Management, 24(3), 297–308. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j. wasman. 2003.09.005.

Zhou, L.; Tokos, H.; Krajnc, D.; Yang, Y. (2012). Sustainability performance evaluation in industry by composite sustainability index. Clean Technologies & Environmental Policy, 14(5), 789–803. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0454-9.

Read Full-Text
About this article

SUBMITTED: 17 September 2025
ACCEPTED: 22 January 2026
PUBLISHED: 26 January 2026
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 127 days
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53623/csue.v6i1.829

Cite this article
Oluwanimifise, M. K. ., & Anyaeche, C. O. (2026). Designing a Holistic Composite Metric for Sustainable Integrated Solid Waste Management: Economic, Social, and Environmental Perspectives . Civil and Sustainable Urban Engineering, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.53623/csue.v6i1.829
Accessed
4
Citations
0
Share this article