Skip to main content

The Shift Towards Green Construction: A Review of Environmental Management Strategies and Sustainable Materials in Developed Countries

Author(s): Brendan Sen 1 , Nicholas Tam 2 , Rabin Maharjan 3 , Amit Kumar Maharjan 4 , Gaurav Talukdar 5
Author(s) information:
1 ADV Environment, Jalan University, 46200 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
2 Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Poland.
3 Department of Civil Engineering, Pulchowk Campus, Institute of Engineering, Tribhuvan University, Nepal
4 Organization for Public Health and Environment Management, Lalitpur Metropolitan City – 10, Nepal
5 Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas, 66045, USA

Corresponding author

Green materials have proven to be highly effective in managing environmental impacts when implemented in construction activities. The aim of this review paper is to critically examine the shift towards green construction practices in developed countries, with a focus on the integration of environmental management strategies and the use of sustainable materials. Currently, developed countries such as Switzerland, Japan, and China have significantly benefited their local environments by implementing these practices in the construction industry. Authorities and governments in these nations have taken proactive steps to establish standards and policies for the construction sector, encouraging more industries to participate in environmental management and protection efforts. The enforcement of rules and regulations in these developed countries has led the construction industry to prioritize environmental management and protection. The use of green materials in construction projects, including autoclaved aerated concrete blocks and green roof technology, has shown positive trends in advancing environmental protection and management. Developing countries are encouraged to adopt similar initiatives and utilize green materials in their construction industries to help secure the importance of environmental sustainability.

Vagtholm, R.; Matteo, A.; Vand, B.; Tupenaite, L. (2023). Evolution and Current State of Building Materials, Construction Methods, and Building Regulations in the U.K.: Implications for Sustainable Building Practices. Buildings, 13, 1480. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061480.

The countries with the most green buildings. BDC network. (accessed on 1 June 2024) Available online: https://www.bdcnetwork.com/countries-most-green-buildings.

Gryshova, I.; Kyzym, M.; Khaustova, V.; Korneev, V.; Kramarev, H. (2020). Assessment of the Industrial Structure and its Influence on Sustainable Economic Development and Quality of Life of the Population of Different World Countries. Sustainability, 12, 2072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052072.

Attahiru, Y.B.; Aziz, M.M.A.; Kassim, K.A.; Shahid, S.; Bakar, W.A.W.A.; NSashruddin, T.F.; Rahman, F.A.; Ahamed, M.I. (2019). A review on green economy and development of green roads and highways using carbon neutral materials. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 101, 600‒613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.036.

Akcay, E.C. (2023). Barriers to Undertaking Green Building Projects in Developing Countries: A Turkish Perspective. Buildings, 13, 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13040841.

Falcone, P.M. (2023). Sustainable Energy Policies in Developing Countries: A Review of Challenges and Opportunities. Energies, 16, 6682. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186682.

Ferriz-Papi, J.A.; Lee, A.; Alhawamdeh, M. (2024). Examining the Challenges for Circular Economy Implementation in Construction and Demolition Waste Management: A Comprehensive Review Using Systematic Methods. Buildings, 14, 1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051237.

Nepal, R.; Phoumin, H.; Khatri, A. (2021). Green Technological Development and Deployment in the Association of Southeast Asian Economies (ASEAN)—At Crossroads or Roundabout? Sustainability, 13, 758. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020758.

Jaiswal, S.V.; Hunt, D.V.L.; Davies, R.J. (2024). Construction 4.0: A Systematic Review of Its Application in Developing Countries. Applied Sciences, 14, 6197. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14146197.

Wang, C.; Che, Y.; Xia, M.; Lin, C.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Chen, H.; Luo, J.; Fan, G. (2024). The Evolution and Future Directions of Green Buildings Research: A Scientometric Analysis. Buildings, 14, 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14020345.

Zhang, Y.; Kang, J.; Jin, H. (2018). A Review of Green Building Development in China from the Perspective of Energy Saving. Energies, 11, 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11020334.

Ensign, P.C.; Roy, S.; Brzustowski, T. (2021). Decisions by Key Office Building Stakeholders to Build or Retrofit Green in Toronto’s Urban Core. Sustainability, 13, 6969. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126969.

Leyder, C.; Klippel, M.; Bartlomé, O.; Heeren, N.; Kissling, S.; Goto, Y.; Frangi, A. (2021). Investigations on the Sustainable Resource Use of Swiss Timber. Sustainability, 13, 1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031237.

Environmental policies and firm-level management practices in Japan. Working paper, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (accessed on 1 June 2024) Available online: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.447.8152&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Bains, M.; Hongyi, Y.; Jialong, C. (2019). International policy perspectives on construction waste minimisation and recycling. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Waste and Resource Management, 172(3), 76–85.

Screening Template for Construction and Demolition Waste Management in The Netherlands. (accessed on 1 June 2024) Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/pdf/waste/studies/deliverables/CDW_The%20Netherlands_Factsheet_Final.pdf.

Green Building Council Italia. (accessed on 1 June 2024) Available online:https://www.worldgbc.org/member-directory/green-building-council-italia.

Ren, W.; Kim, K. (2023). A Study on the Green Building Trend in China—From 2001 to 2022, Focusing on Research Topic Words. Sustainability, 15, 13505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813505.

A low carbon, circular economy approach to concrete procurement. (accessed on 1 June 2024) Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/news_alert/Issue_88_Case_Study_168_Zurich.pdf.

Gherman, I.-E.; Lakatos, E.-S.; Clinci, S.D.; Lungu, F.; Constandoiu, V.V.; Cioca, L.I.; Rada, E.C. (2023). Circularity outlines in the construction and demolition waste management: A literature review. Recycling, 8, 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling8050069.

Construction Environmental Management Plan: Fraser Surrey Port Lands – Transportation Improvements. (accessed on 1 June 2024) Available online: https://www.portvancouver.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Appendix-J-Construction-Environmental-Management-Plan.pdf.

Jorat, M.E.; Minto, A.; Tierney, I.; Gilmour, D. (2024). Future carbon-neutral societies: Minimising construction impact on groundwater-dependent wetlands and peatlands. Sustainability, 16, 7713. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177713.

Nikzad, R.; Sedigh, G. (2017). Greenhouse gas emissions and green technologies in Canada. Environmental Development, 24, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2017.01.001.

Kubáňová, J.; Kubasáková, I.; Čulík, K.; Štítik, L. (2022). Implementation of barcode technology to logistics processes of a company. Sustainability, 14, 790. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020790.

Jolly, R.; Fairweather, H.; Rayburg, S.; Rodwell, J. (2024). Life cycle assessment and cost analysis of mid-rise mass timber vs. concrete buildings in Australia. Sustainability, 16, 6465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156465.

Zuo, J.; Pullen, S.; Rameezdeen, R.; Bennetts, H.; Wang, Y.; Mao, G.; Zhou, Z.; Du, H.; Duan, H. (2017). Green building evaluation from a life-cycle perspective in Australia: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.251.

Gabaldón-Estevan, D.; Criado, E.; Monfort, E. (2014). The green factor in European manufacturing: A case study of the Spanish ceramic tile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 70, 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.018.

Khaiyum, M.Z.; Sarker, S.; Kabir, G. (2023). Evaluation of carbon emission factors in the cement industry: An emerging economy context. Sustainability, 15, 15407. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115407.

Imbabi, M.S.; Carrigan, C.; McKenna, S. (2012). Trends and developments in green cement and concrete technology. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 1(2), 194–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2013.05.001.

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs). (accessed on 1 June 2024) Available online: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/air/volatile-organic-compounds-vocs#:~:text=Exposure%20to%20VOCs%20themselves%20can,are%20suspected%20or%20proven%20carcinogens.

Mennicken, L.; Janz, A.; Roth, S. (2016). The German R&D program for CO2 utilization—innovations for a green economy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(11), 11386–11392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6641-1.

Li, X.; Qin, Q.; Yang, Y. (2023). The impact of green innovation on carbon emissions: Evidence from the construction sector in China. Energies, 16, 4529. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16114529.

Studer, W.P.; De Brito Mello, L.C.B. (2021). Core Elements Underlying Supply Chain Management in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review. Buildings, 11, 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11120569.

Murthi, P.; Sri, N.V.; Baig, M.M.; Sajid, M.A.; Kaveri, S. (2022). Development of green concrete using effective utilization of autoclaved aerated concrete brick trash as lightweight aggregate. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.316.

Autoclaved aerated cement blocks (AAC blocks)—properties and advantages. (accessed on 1 June 2024) Available online: https://theconstructor.org/building/autoclaved-aerated-cement-blocks-aac-properties-advantages/37211/.

Rafiza, A.R.; Fazlizan, A.; Thongtha, A.; Asim, N.; Noorashikin, M.S. (2022). The physical and mechanical properties of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) with recycled AAC as a partial replacement for sand. Buildings, 12, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010060.

Autoclaved aerated concrete. (accessed on 1 June 2024) Available online: https://www.yourhome.gov.au/materials/autoclaved-aerated-concrete#:~:text=Increasingly%2C%20AAC%20is%20being%20used,panels%20available%20from%20the%20manufacturer.

Dvorak, B.; Volder, A. (2010). Green roof vegetation for North American ecoregions: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 96(4), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.04.009.

Han, Y.; Wang, Z. (2023). Transplantation and adaptation: Research on reinforced concrete structures in modern Nanjing (1909–1949). Buildings, 13, 1468. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061468.

Hamid, H.N.A.; Romali, N.S.; Rahman, R.A. (2023). Key barriers and feasibility of implementing green roofs on buildings in Malaysia. Buildings, 13, 2233. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092233.

Azkorra-Larrinaga, Z.; Romero-Antón, N.; Martin-Escudero, K.; Lopez-Ruiz, G. (2023). Environmentally sustainable green roof design for energy demand reduction. Buildings, 13, 1846. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071846.

About this article

SUBMITTED: 27 August 2024
ACCEPTED: 07 October 2024
PUBLISHED: 11 October 2024
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 41 days
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53623/tebt.v2i2.482

Cite this article
Sen, B., Tam, N., Maharjan, R. ., Maharjan, A. K. ., & Talukdar, G. . (2024). The Shift Towards Green Construction: A Review of Environmental Management Strategies and Sustainable Materials in Developed Countries. Tropical Environment, Biology, and Technology, 2(2), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.53623/tebt.v2i2.482
Keywords
Accessed
190
Citations
0
Share this article