Skip to main content
Article | Industrial and Domestic Waste Management | Volume 6 - Issue 2 - 2026 | 474−490 | https://doi.org/10.53623/idwm.v6i2.1326
© 2026 by the author(s), and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License

Mitigating Food Loss and Supply Chain Risks in Red Chili Distribution Using the SCOR-Based House of Risk Approach: A Case Study from Indonesia

Author(s): Syarifah Akmal ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4270-5684 , Yusran Lingga , Syamsul Bahri , Subhan , Anwar
Author(s) information:
Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh, Indonesia

Corresponding author

Industrial and Domestic Waste Management

Volume 6 - Issue 2 - 2026

 About the journal
Submit your article

Red chili was a strategic horticultural commodity whose distribution process was highly exposed to supply chain risks that could reduce product quality, disrupt delivery performance, and increase operational costs. This study aimed to identify supply chain risk events and risk agents, determine the dominant sources of risk, and prioritize mitigation strategies for the red chili distribution route from Sidikalang to Medan Central Market using the House of Risk (HOR) method. Supply chain activities were first mapped based on the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model, while primary data were collected through interviews and questionnaires involving selected distributors using purposive sampling. House of Risk Phase 1 was applied to evaluate the Aggregate Risk Potential (ARP), followed by House of Risk Phase 2 to determine mitigation priorities using Total Effectiveness (TE) and the Effectiveness-to-Difficulty Ratio (ETD). The results identified 14 risk events and 17 risk agents distributed across the Plan, Source, Deliver, and Return processes. Pareto analysis showed that 11 dominant risk agents accounted for 81.77% of the total ARP value (10,724), with the most critical risks arising from poor road conditions along the Sidikalang–Medan route, adverse weather conditions, and market price fluctuations. Nine preventive actions were proposed, with the preparation of alternative departure schedules combined with continuous monitoring of weather and road conditions identified as the highest-priority mitigation strategy based on the highest ETD value. These findings demonstrated that the integration of the SCOR model and House of Risk provided a systematic approach to identifying priority risks and developing practical mitigation strategies to improve the reliability and resilience of red chili supply chain distribution.

Read Full-Text
Previous article
Next article

Renaldi, E.; Pardian, P.; Kuswatim, S.H. (2025). Analisis efisiensi struktur rantai pasok agribisnis cabai merah besar di Desa Sindulang, Kabupaten Sumedang. Jurnal Pertanian Agros, 27, 346–354. https://doi.org/10.37159/jpa.v27i3.110.

Muflikh, Y.N.; Smith, C.; Brown, C.; Aziz, A.A. (2021). Analysing price volatility in agricultural value chains using systems thinking: A case study of the Indonesian chilli value chain. Agricultural Systems, 192, 103179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103179.

Muflikh, Y.N.; Adhikari, R.; Abdul Aziz, A. (2023). Governance structures and price volatility perceptions in the Indonesian chilli value chain. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 13, 631–655. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-08-2021-0198.

Anam, S.; et al. (2025). Analisis sistem rantai pasok modern: Studi literatur terhadap perkembangan terbaru. Jurnal Penelitian Nusantara, 1, 210–213. https://doi.org/10.59435/menulis.v1i7.526.

Behzadi, G.; O'Sullivan, M.J.; Olsen, T.L.; Zhang, A. (2018). Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models. Omega, 79, 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.07.005.

Ghadge, A.; Wurtmann, H.; Seuring, S. (2020). Managing climate change risks in global supply chains: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 58, 44–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1629670.

Qange, S.; Mdoda, L.; Mditshwa, A. (2024). Modeling the critical causal factors of postharvest losses in the vegetable supply chain in eThekwini Metropolitan Municipality: The log-linear regression model. Heliyon, 10, e39565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39565.

Mizani, T.T.; Azis, A.M. (2021). Analisis kerangka kerja, aliran, dan hambatan rantai pasokan. Jurnal Manajemen Maranatha, 21, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.28932/jmm.v21i1.4040.

Khalid, R.U.; Jajja, M.S.S.; Ahsan, M.B. (2024). Supply chain sustainability and risk management in food cold chains – A literature review. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 6, 193–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSCRA-07-2023-0030.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Dairi. (2023). Statistik Hortikultura Kabupaten Dairi Tahun 2022; Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Dairi: Sidikalang, Indonesia.

Direktorat Jenderal Hortikultura. (2024). Profil Hortikultura Indonesia; Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia: Jakarta, Indonesia.

Soimun, A.; Sadri, P.D.A.; Navianti, D.R.; Fitri, S.N. (2025). The impact of traffic congestion on freight transport efficiency in a tourism corridor: A case study of the Denpasar–Gilimanuk road. Journal of Applied Sciences in Travel and Hospitality, 8, 177–198. https://doi.org/10.31940/jasth.v8i2.177-198.

Purwaningsih, R.; Ibrahim, C.N.; Susanto, N. (2021). Analisis dan mitigasi risiko supply chain pada pengadaan material produksi dengan model House of Risk (HOR) pada PT. Toba Pulp Lestari Tbk, Porsea, Sumatra Utara. MIX: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 11, 64. https://doi.org/10.22441/mix.2021.v11i1.005.

Heckmann, I.; Comes, T.; Nickel, S. (2015). A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling. Omega, 52, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.004.

Pujawan, I.N.; Geraldin, L.H. (2009). House of risk: A model for proactive supply chain risk management. Business Process Management Journal, 15, 953–967. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150911003801.

Stamatis, D.H. (2003). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution, 2nd ed.; ASQ Quality Press: Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Huan, S.H.; Sheoran, S.K.; Wang, G. (2004). A review and analysis of supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540410517557.

Prasetyo, D.S.; Emaputra, A.; Parwati, C.I. (2021). Pengukuran kinerja supply chain management menggunakan pendekatan model Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) pada IKM Kerupuk Subur. Jurnal PASTI, 15, 80. https://doi.org/10.22441/pasti.2021.v15i1.008.

Sayuti, M.; Fatimah, F.; Sahara, S. (2022). Analisis manajemen resiko pada unit pengantongan Semen Padang dengan pendekatan House of Risk. Industrial Engineering Journal, 11. https://doi.org/10.53912/iej.v11i2.947.

Immawan, T.; Putri, D.K. (2018). House of risk approach for assessing supply chain risk management strategies: A case study in Crumb Rubber Company Ltd. MATEC Web of Conferences, 154, 01097. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815401097.

Avila-Arteaga, C.; Arauco-Galarza, G.; Ramos, E.; Shinno-Huamani, M. (2021). Supply chain management based on house of risk: A case study in a Peruvian banana company. pp. 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55307-4_78.

Ulfah, M.; Trenggonowati, D.L.; Muharni, Y. (2023). Aksi mitigasi risiko rantai pasok kue kering Tando. Journal of Systems Engineering and Management, 2, 148. https://doi.org/10.36055/joseam.v2i2.22221.

Ulfah, M.M.; et al. (2024). Analisis risiko rantai pasok produk genteng menggunakan metode House of Risk. Journal of Systems Engineering and Management, 3, 123. https://doi.org/10.62870/joseam.v3i2.30073.

Ma'ruf, M.F. (2025). Pengukuran kinerja rantai pasok menggunakan pendekatan model SCOR pada perusahaan retail. Paradoks: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 8. https://doi.org/10.57178/paradoks.v8i2.1213.

Asrory, F.F. (2023). Analisis risiko rantai pasok menggunakan metode Supply Chain Operation Reference (SCOR) dan House of Risk (HOR) pada PT Indo Pusaka Berau. Sebatik, 27. https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v27i2.2415.

Prakash, S.; Soni, G.; Rathore, A.P.S.; Singh, S. (2017). Risk analysis and mitigation for perishable food supply chain: A case of dairy industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24, 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2015-0070.

Memon, M.A.; Thurasamy, R.; Ting, H.; Cheah, J.-H. (2024). Purposive sampling: A review and guidelines for quantitative research. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.9(1)01.

Ahmad, M.; Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59, 1461–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5.

Morgan, A.K.; Dogbey, E.; Arimeyaw, W.A.; Owusu, A.F.S. (2019). Effect of road transport accessibility on agricultural produce marketing and livelihoods of farmers in the Kasena-Nankana West District of Ghana. The Journal of Development Practice, 5, 39–46.

Read Full-Text
About this article

SUBMITTED: 05 August 2026
ACCEPTED: 28 September 2026
PUBLISHED: 2 October 2026
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 54 days
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53623/idwm.v6i2.1326

Cite this article
Akmal, S., Lingga, Y., Bahri, S. ., Subhan, & Anwar. (2026). Mitigating Food Loss and Supply Chain Risks in Red Chili Distribution Using the SCOR-Based House of Risk Approach: A Case Study from Indonesia. Industrial and Domestic Waste Management, 6(2), 474−490. https://doi.org/10.53623/idwm.v6i2.1326
Keywords
House of Risk red chili risk mitigation SCOR supply chain.
Citations
0
Share this article