The construction sector is both essential for global economic progress and one of the largest contributors to pollution, resource depletion, and energy consumption. Given the urgent need to adopt more sustainable practices, governments in developed countries have introduced policies aimed at fostering a circular economy in this sector. These policies emphasize the use of green materials to reduce resource consumption, energy use, and greenhouse gas emissions, aligning with global sustainability goals. The waste hierarchy further governs these policies, prioritizing waste reduction, reuse, and recycling. This study analyzes the effectiveness of these government policies in promoting circular economy principles, particularly the adoption of green materials in the construction industry. Our findings reveal that while these policies have led to measurable reductions in energy consumption and emissions, the extent of green material adoption varies significantly across countries. Key factors influencing this variation include economic incentives, regulatory enforcement, and the level of industry acceptance of green technologies. One of the most important results of this study is the identification of significant gaps between policy intent and actual industry practices. In many cases, green materials, despite their favorable characteristics, have not been widely implemented due to economic, technical, and market barriers. These findings underscore the need for stronger government incentives and more consistent policy enforcement to drive broader adoption of sustainable practices. Future studies should focus on overcoming these barriers, exploring the long-term economic impacts of green material adoption, and evaluating how policy frameworks can be optimized to ensure more widespread.
Leon, M.; Cornejo, G.; Calderón, M.; González-Carrión, E.; Florez, H. (2022). Effect of Deforestation on Climate Change: A Co-Integration and Causality Approach with Time Series. Sustainability, 14, 11303. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811303.
Tafesse, S.; Girma, Y.E.; Dessalegn, E. (2022). Analysis of the socio-economic and environmental impacts of construction waste management practices. Heliyon, 8(3), e09169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09169.
Giorgi, S.; Lavagna, M.; Wang, K.; Osmani, M.; Liu, G.; Campioli, A. (2022). Drivers and barriers towards circular economy in the building sector: Stakeholder interviews and analysis of five European countries policies and practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 336, 130395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130395.
Niu, Y.; Rasi, K.; Hughes, M.; Halme, M.; Fink, G. (2021). Prolonging life cycles of construction materials and combating climate change by cascading: The case of reusing timber in Finland. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 170, 105555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105555.
Zhang, C.; Hu, M.; Di Maio, F.; Sprecher, B.; Yang, X.; Tukker, A. (2022). An overview of the waste hierarchy framework for analyzing the circularity in construction and demolition waste management in Europe. Science of The Total Environment, 803, 149892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149892.
Leiringer, R. (2020). Sustainable Construction through Industry Self-Regulation: The Development and Role of Building Environmental Assessment Methods in Achieving Green Building. Sustainability, 12, 8853. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218853.
Yu, Y.; Junjan, V.; Yazan, D.M.; Iacob, M.E. (2022). A systematic literature review on Circular Economy implementation in the construction industry: A policy-making perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 183, 106359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106359.
Waste prevention in Europe—policies, status and trends in reuse in 2017. (accessed on 12 July 2024) Available online: https://ezb.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/detail.phtml?bibid=AAAAA&colors=7&lang=en&jour_id=454756.
Sandanayake, M.S. (2022). Environmental Impacts of Construction in Building Industry—A Review of Knowledge Advances, Gaps and Future Directions. Knowledge, 2, 139‒156. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge2010008.
EU construction and demolition waste protocol and guidelines. (accessed on 12 July 2024) Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/growth/items/455097/en.
Anastasiades, K.; Blom, J.; Audenaert, A. (2023). Circular Construction Indicator: Assessing Circularity in the Design, Construction, and End-of-Life Phase. Recycling, 8, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling8020029.
Guidelines for the Waste Audits before Demolition and Renovation Works of Buildings. (accessed on 12 July 2024) Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/31521/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native.
Motiei, M.; Iyer-Raniga, U.; Andamon, M.M.; Khodabakhshian, A. (2024). Advancing Circular Buildings: A Review of Building Strategies for AEC Stakeholders. Buildings, 14, 2594. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092594.
Alhawamdeh, M.; Ferriz-Papi, J.A.; Lee, A. (2024). Examining the Drivers to Support Improved Construction and Demolition Waste Management for a Circular Economy: A Comprehensive Review Using a Systematic Approach. Sustainability, 16, 6014. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146014.
Gálvez-Martos, J.L.; Styles, D.; Schoenberger, H.; Zeschmar-Lahl, B. (2018). Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 136, 166‒178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.016.
Luciano, A.; Cutaia, L.; Altamura, P.; Penalvo, E. (2022). Critical issues hindering a widespread construction and demolition waste (CDW) recycling practice in EU countries and actions to undertake: The stakeholder's perspective. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 29, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2022.100745.
Saka, N.; Olanipekun, A.O.; Omotayo, T. (2021). Reward and compensation incentives for enhancing green building construction. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 11, 100138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2021.100138.
Huang, Z.; Fan, H. (2022). Responsibility-sharing subsidy policy for reducing diesel emissions from in-use off-road construction equipment. Applied Energy, 320, 119301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119301.
Reis, J.S.d.M.; Espuny, M.; Nunhes, T.V.; Sampaio, N.A.d.S.; Isaksson, R.; Campos, F.C.d.; Oliveira, O.J.d. (2021). Striding towards sustainability: A framework to overcome challenges and explore opportunities through Industry 4.0. Sustainability, 13, 5232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095232.
Zhao, X.; Castka, P.; Searcy, C. (2020). ISO standards: A platform for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 2. Sustainability, 12, 9332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229332.
Bucea-Manea-Țoniș, R.; Dourado Martins, O.M.; Ilic, D.; Belous, M.; Bucea-Manea-Țoniș, R.; Braicu, C.; Simion, V.-E. (2021). Green and sustainable public procurement—An instrument for nudging consumer behavior: A case study on Romanian green public agriculture across different sectors of activity. Sustainability, 13, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010012.
Fei, W.; Opoku, A.; Agyekum, K.; Oppon, J.A.; Ahmed, V.; Chen, C.; Lok, K.L. (2021). The critical role of the construction industry in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Delivering projects for the common good. Sustainability, 13, 9112. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169112.
Waste treatment in 2016, 1,000 tonnes. (accessed on 12 July 2024) Available online: http://www.stat.fi/til/jate/2016/jate_2016_2018-08-31_tau_002_en.html.
Schützenhofer, S.; Kovacic, I.; Rechberger, H.; Mack, S. (2022). Improvement of environmental sustainability and circular economy through construction waste management for material reuse. Sustainability, 14, 11087. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711087.
Martinho, F.C.G.; Silva, H.M.R.D.; Oliveira, J.R.M.; Moura, C.F.N.; Loureiro, C.D.A.; Silvestre, J.D.; Rodrigues, M.M.M. (2024). Mechanical and environmental performance of asphalt concrete with high amounts of recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) for use in surface courses of pavements. Sustainability, 16, 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010248.
Roth, L.; Eklund, M. (2003). Environmental evaluation of reuse of by-products as road construction materials in Sweden. Waste Management, 23(2), 107‒116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00052-1.
Gu, J.; Guo, F.; Peng, X.; Wang, B. (2023). Green and sustainable construction industry: A systematic literature review of the contractor’s green construction capability. Buildings, 13, 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020470.
Vogtländer, J.; van der Lugt, P.; Brezet, H. (2010). The sustainability of bamboo products for local and Western European applications: LCAs and land-use. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(13), 1260‒1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.015.
Ferrara, P.L.; La Noce, M.; Sciuto, G. (2023). Sustainability of green building materials: A scientometric review of geopolymers from a circular economy perspective. Sustainability, 15, 16047. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216047.
Yadav, M.; Mathur, A. (2021). Bamboo as a sustainable material in the construction industry: An overview. Materials Today: Proceedings, 43, 2872‒2876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.125.
Mohan, N.; Dash, S.P.; Boby, N.M.; Shetty, D. (2022). Study of bamboo as a building material – Construction & preservation techniques and its sustainability. Materials Today: Proceedings, 60, 100‒114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.263.
Rincón, C.E.; Montoya, J.A.; Archila, H.F. (2023). Bamboo Construction Inspired by Vernacular Techniques for Reducing Carbon Footprint: A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Sustainability, 15, 16893. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416893.
Adier, M.F.V.; Sevilla, M.E.P.; Valerio, D.N.R.; Ongpeng, J.M.C. (2023). Bamboo as sustainable building materials: A systematic review of properties, treatment methods, and standards. Buildings, 13, 2449. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13102449.
Zia, A.; Pu, Z.; Holly, I.; Umar, T.; Tariq, M.A.U.R.; Sufian, M. (2022). A comprehensive review of incorporating steel fibers of waste tires in cement composites and its applications. Materials, 15, 7420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15217420.
Qin, X.; Kaewunruen, S. (2022). Environment-friendly recycled steel fibre reinforced concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 327, 126967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126967.
Gabasiane, T.S.; Danha, G.; Mamvura, T.A.; Mashifana, T.; Dzinomwa, G. (2021). Environmental and socioeconomic impact of copper slag—A review. Crystals, 11, 1504. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11121504.
Ahmad, J.; Majdi, A.; Deifalla, A.F.; Isleem, H.F.; Rahmawati, C. (2022). Concrete made with partially substitutions of copper slag (CPS): State of the art review. Materials, 15, 5196. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155196.
Siddique, R.; Singh, M.; Jain, M. (2020). Recycling copper slag in steel fibre concrete for sustainable construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271, 122559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122559.
Kumar, N.; Kandasami, R.K.; Singh, S. (2022). Effective utilization of natural fibres (coir and jute) for sustainable low-volume rural road construction – A critical review. Construction and Building Materials, 347, 128606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128606.
Patel, R.V.; Yadav, A.; Winczek, J. (2023). Physical, mechanical, and thermal properties of natural fiber-reinforced epoxy composites for construction and automotive applications. Applied Sciences, 13, 5126. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13085126.
Simões, N.; Almeida, R.; Tadeu, A.; Brett, M.; Almeida, J. (2020). Comparison between cork-based and conventional green roof solutions. Building and Environment, 175, 106812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106812.
Al Shdifat, M.; Jalón, M.L.; Puertas, E.; Chiachío, J. (2023). A quantitative group decision-making methodology for structural eco-materials selection based on qualitative sustainability attributes. Applied Sciences, 13, 12310. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132212310.
Vijayan, D.S.; Dineshkumar, S.A.; Janarthanan, T.S. (2020). Evaluation of ferrock: A greener substitute to cement. Materials Today: Proceedings, 22, 781-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.147.
Asnor, A.S.; Al-Mohammad, M.S.; Wan Ahmad, S.; Almutairi, S.; Rahman, R.A. (2022). Challenges for implementing environmental management plans in construction projects: The case of Malaysia. Sustainability, 14, 6231. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106231.
Bashir, H.; Al-Hawarneh, A.; Haridy, S.; Shamsuzzaman, M.; Aydin, R. (2024). Barriers to implementing environmental sustainability in UAE construction project management: Identification and comparison of ISO 14001-certified and non-certified firms. Sustainability, 16, 6779. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166779.
SUBMITTED: 27 August 2024
ACCEPTED: 10 October 2024
PUBLISHED:
19 October 2024
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 45 days
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53623/csue.v4i2.481