Skip to main content
Review | Emerging Perspective in Social and Politics | Volume 1 - Issue 1 - 2026 | 17−31 |
© 2026 by the author(s), and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License

Youth Political Engagement in Transitional Societies: Trends, Drivers, and Challenges

Author(s): Kwame A. Mensah 1 , Ama Serwaa Boateng 2
Author(s) information:
1 Department of Political Science, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
2 Department of Governance and Development Studies, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana

Corresponding author

Emerging Perspective in Social and Politics

Volume 1 - Issue 1 - 2026

 About the journal
Submit your article

Youth political engagement plays a critical role in shaping democratic development, particularly in transitional societies undergoing shifts from authoritarian rule, conflict, or major political reform. This mini review synthesizes recent literature to examine the trends, drivers, and challenges influencing youth participation in these contexts. Key trends include the increasing use of digital platforms for political mobilization, the rise of youth-led movements and grassroots activism, and a shift from traditional, party-based engagement toward issue-driven, noninstitutional forms of participation. Drivers of engagement encompass education and civic awareness, which equip youth with the knowledge and skills necessary for informed participation; digital media and information access, which enable rapid communication and advocacy; socioeconomic conditions, including unemployment and social inequality, which motivate activism; and political opportunities and institutional reforms, which create formal avenues for meaningful involvement. Despite these enabling factors, youth face persistent challenges such as political distrust, weak institutions, limited representation, legal restrictions, and risks associated with digital misinformation. Addressing these barriers is essential for enhancing the effectiveness and sustainability of youth participation. Policy implications include strengthening civic education and leadership programs, promoting inclusive political institutions, supporting safe and constructive digital engagement, and increasing youth representation in governance. The review underscores the importance of empowering youth as active agents of change to consolidate democratic processes in transitional societies. Future research is needed to evaluate the long-term impacts of youth political engagement on governance, policy reform, and social cohesion, providing evidence-based guidance for policymakers, educators, and civil society actors.

Read Full-Text
Previous article
Next article

Wielath, S.; Pelzer, M.; Hofmann-van de Poll, F.; Rottach, A. (2025). Political participation of marginalized young people: Examining funding programs from a European and national perspective. Youth, 5, 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth5040108.

Pontes, A.; Henn, M.; Griffiths, M.D. (2018). Towards a conceptualization of young people’s political engagement: A qualitative focus group study. Societies, 8, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8010017.

Weiffen, B.; Battistuzzi Penachioni, J. (2025). Interrogating transitional justice: The multiple meanings of a concept. Societies, 15, 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15050123.

Zikos, D. (2020). Revisiting the role of institutions in transformative contexts: Institutional change and conflicts. Sustainability, 12, 9036. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219036.

Ndlovu, J. (2025). Church-led social capital and public-health approaches to youth violence in urban Zimbabwe: Perspectives from church leaders. Social Sciences, 14, 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14100602.

Chamusca, P. (2024). Discontent, populism, or the revenge of the “places that don’t matter”? Analysis of the rise of the far-right in Portugal. Societies, 14, 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14060080.

Oubiña López, M.; Gómez Baya, D. (2025). Interventions to promote civic engagement among youth and its outcomes on mental health: A scoping review. Children, 12, 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12060665.

Young, A.; Toraif, N.; Le, C.; Barnett, K.G.; Augsberger, A. (2024). Facing power: Navigating power dynamics in a youth participatory action research project situated within a healthcare setting. Journal of Community Practice, 32, 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2024.2385624.

Firinci Orman, T. (2025). Everyday activism performances and liminal political positionings of early youth in Bulgaria: Learning to be environmental subjects. Youth, 5, 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth5010025.

Asimakopoulos, G.; Antonopoulou, H.; Mitropoulos, I.; Halkiopoulos, C. (2026). What makes digital citizenship fragile: A review of the social mechanisms underlying democratic participation. Societies, 16, 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16020070.

Lundberg, E.; Abdelzadeh, A. (2025). The role of youth extracurricular activities and political intentions in later political participation and civic engagement. Journal of Adolescence, 97, 662–674. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12443.

Alscher, P.; Jana, C. (2025). Exploring the relationship between non-institutionalized political participation and political efficacy among high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 54, 2143–2154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02186-9.

Almeida, N.; Giger, J.-C. (2025). Adapting to electoral changes: Insights from a systematic review on electoral abstention dynamics. Societies, 15, 308. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15110308.

Hart, J.; Henn, M. (2017). Neoliberalism and the unfolding patterns of young people’s political engagement and political participation in contemporary Britain. Societies, 7, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc7040033.

Ihsaniyati, H.; Sarwoprasodjo, S.; Muljono, P.; Gandasari, D. (2023). The use of social media for development communication and social change: A review. Sustainability, 15, 2283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032283.

Osman, N.S.; Kim, J.-H.; Park, J.-H.; Park, H.-W. (2025). Identifying the impacts of social movement mobilization on YouTube: Social network analysis. Information, 16, 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16010055.

Gorodnichenko, Y.; Roland, G. (2021). Culture, institutions and democratization. Public Choice, 187, 165–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-020-00811-8.

Billi, M.; Zurbriggen, C.; Urquiza, A.; Allendes, A. (2024). Transition in action: Toward a social theory of the governance of transitions. Frontiers in Sociology, 9, 1206050. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1206050.

Malorni, A.; Dolan, S.; Hong, A.; Joseph, N.; Mohamed, K.; Moore, L.; Phan, L.; Skoglund, I.; Too, I.; Wittman, S. (2024). Youth sociopolitical development: A conceptual framework by racial and gender minoritized youth organizers. American Journal of Community Psychology, 73, 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12729.

Page, M.J.; Moher, D.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; Chou, R.; Glanville, J.; Grimshaw, J.M.; Hróbjartsson, A.; Lalu, M.M.; Li, T.; Loder, E.W.; Mayo-Wilson, E.; McDonald, S.; McGuinness, L.A.; Stewart, L.A.; Thomas, J.; Tricco, A.C.; Welch, V.A.; Whiting, P.; McKenzie, J.E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160.

Zhang, W. (2022). Political disengagement among youth: A comparison between 2011 and 2020. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 809432. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809432.

Malorni, A.; Wilf, S. (2025). Unpacking social media's role in sociopolitical development amidst the dual pandemics: Perspectives of marginalized adolescent organizers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 35, e70048. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.70048.

Hansen, T.; Taylor, C.K.; Knowles, R.T. (2025). Digital media and political engagement: Shaping youth environmental attitudes and behaviors in four European societies. Societies, 15, 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15110300.

Alodat, A.M.; Al-Qora’n, L.F.; Abu Hamoud, M. (2023). Social media platforms and political participation: A study of Jordanian youth engagement. Social Sciences, 12, 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12070402.

Wahyuningroem, S.L.; Sirait, R.; Uljanatunnisa, U.; Heryadi, D. (2024). Youth political participation and digital movement in Indonesia: The case of #ReformasiDikorupsi and #TolakOmnibusLaw. F1000Research, 12, 543. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.122669.3.

Zhang, X.; Burkhanova, D.; Yang, Y.; Tian, J. (2025). Political participation and grassroots governance: A social work perspective based on CGSS 2021 data. PLoS ONE, 20, e0337520. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337520.

Giovanelli, A.; Ozer, E.M.; Dahl, R.E. (2020). Leveraging technology to improve health in adolescence: A developmental science perspective. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67, S7–S13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.02.020.

McGorry, P.; Gunasiri, H.; Mei, C.; Rice, S.; Gao, C.X. (2025). The youth mental health crisis: Analysis and solutions. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, 1517533. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1517533.

Thananithichot, S.; Satidporn, W.; Kongdecha, K. (2026). Promoting youth political engagement through serious games: A quasi-experimental study on local election boardgame in Thailand. Journal of Political Science Education, 22, 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2025.2479812.

Gómez, R.L.; Suárez, A.M. (2023). Pedagogical practices and civic knowledge and engagement in Latin America: Multilevel analysis using ICCS data. Heliyon, 9, e21319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21319.

Borojević, T.; Petrović, N.; Radaković, J.A.; Glomazić, H.; Radojičić, M.; Milenković, N.; Maletič, D.; Maletič, M. (2023). Youth participation for sustainable value creation: The role and prioritization of SDGs. Sustainability, 15, 16456. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316456.

Kulachai, W.; Lerdtomornsakul, U.; Homyamyen, P. (2023). Factors influencing voting decision: A comprehensive literature review. Social Sciences, 12, 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12090469.

Tzima, S. (2024). How can public administration foster political participation among youths. Proceedings, 111, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024111027.

Pîrvulescu, C. (2026). Institutional resilience and democratic sustainability in post-transition Europe: Lessons from Romania and Central-Eastern Europe. World, 7, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/world7010007.

Challoumis, C.; Eriotis, N.; Vasiliou, D. (2025). The role of pressure groups in Greek economic structure. World, 6, 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/world6040150.

Yassine, A.; Bakass, F. (2023). Youth’s poverty and inequality of opportunities: Empirical evidence from Morocco. Social Sciences, 12, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12010028.

Bounds, D.T.; Posey, P.D. (2022). A resistance framework for racially minoritized youth behaviors during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 32, 959–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12792.

Moysan, T.; Ródenas-Rigla, F. (2024). The participatory processes in public policy-making: A scoping review. Societies, 14, 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14120244.

Oh, Y.; Jeong, S.-H.; Shin, H. (2019). A strategy for a sustainable local government: Are participatory governments more efficient, effective, and equitable in the budget process? Sustainability, 11, 5312. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195312.

Saltiel, I.N.; Sklias, P. (2023). From schoolyards to government: A comparative analysis of the positive effect of teenager participation in local governance. Social Sciences, 12, 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12110597.

Read Full-Text
About this article

SUBMITTED: 08 March 2026
ACCEPTED: 09 April 2026
PUBLISHED: 13 April 2026
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 33 days

Citations
0
Share this article