Skip to main content

Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Psychological Resilience: A Review

Author(s): Meera S. Rajagopal , Daniel O. Kwansah
Author(s) information:
University of Pretoria, Cnr Lynnwood Road & Roper Street, Hatfield, Pretoria, South Africa

Corresponding author

Psychological resilience, broadly defined as positive adaptation in the context of significant adversity, has become a prominent construct in developmental and clinical psychology. However, foundational theories and measures of resilience have largely been developed within Western, individualistic cultural contexts, raising concerns about their cross-cultural applicability. This review synthesizes evidence on how cultural contexts shape the conceptualization, expression, and measurement of psychological resilience. Eighteen peer-reviewed journal articles were reviewed and synthesized across four interconnected domains: theoretical and conceptual foundations of resilience, particularly the transition from trait-based perspectives to social-ecological models; methodological approaches to cross-cultural resilience research, including standardized scale validation and mixed-methods measure development; cultural variation in resilience processes among collectivist, Indigenous, and refugee populations; and developmental and lifespan considerations in cross-cultural resilience research. Four synthesis tables and a conceptual radial framework were used to integrate and map the major themes identified across the literature. The findings demonstrate that resilience is better understood as a culturally situated, socially embedded, and ecologically influenced process rather than as a culturally invariant individual trait. Culturally grounded measurement approaches, including the Child and Youth Resilience Measure, appear particularly useful for capturing contextually meaningful individual, relational, community, and cultural resources that may be overlooked by direct translations of measures developed in Western settings. These findings highlight the importance of culturally responsive conceptualization and assessment of resilience and provide implications for cross-cultural measurement, intervention development, and future research.

Southwick, S.M.; Bonanno, G.A.; Masten, A.S.; Panter-Brick, C.; Yehuda, R. (2014). Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: Interdisciplinary perspectives. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5, 25338. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338.

Fletcher, D.; Sarkar, M. (2013). Psychological resilience: A review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory. European Psychologist, 18, 12‒23. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000124.

Ungar, M. (2008). Resilience across cultures. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 218‒235. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl343.

Masten, A.S. (2014). Global perspectives on resilience in children and youth. Child Development, 85, 6‒20. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12205.

Tricco, A.C.; Lillie, E.; Zarin, W.; O'Brien, K.K.; Colquhoun, H.; Levac, D.; Moher, D.; Peters, M.D.J.; Horsley, T.; Weeks, L.; Hempel, S.; Akl, E.A.; Chang, C.; McGowan, J.; Stewart, L.; Hartling, L.; Aldcroft, A.; Wilson, M.G.; Garritty, C.; Lewin, S.; Godfrey, C.M.; Macdonald, M.T.; Langlois, E.V.; Soares-Weiser, K.; Moriarty, J.; Clifford, T.; Tunçalp, Ö.; Straus, S.E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169, 467‒473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.

Masten, A.S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56, 227‒238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227.

Luthar, S.S.; Cicchetti, D.; Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543‒562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00164.

Bonanno, G.A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59, 20‒28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20.

Ungar, M. (2011). The social ecology of resilience: Addressing contextual and cultural ambiguity of a nascent construct. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81, 1‒17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01067.x.

Ungar, M. (2013). Resilience, trauma, context, and culture. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14, 255‒266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838013487805.

Kirmayer, L.J.; Dandeneau, S.; Marshall, E.; Phillips, M.K.; Williamson, K.J. (2011). Rethinking resilience from indigenous perspectives. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56, 84‒91. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371105600203.

Panter-Brick, C.; Hadfield, K.; Dajani, R.; Eggerman, M.; Ager, A.; Ungar, M. (2018). Resilience in context: A brief and culturally grounded measure for Syrian refugee and Jordanian host-community adolescents. Child Development, 89, 1803‒1820. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12868.

Windle, G.; Bennett, K.M.; Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-8.

Terrana, A.; Al-Delaimy, W. (2023). A systematic review of cross-cultural measures of resilience and its promotive and protective factors. Transcultural Psychiatry, 60, 733‒750. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634615231167661.

Ungar, M.; Liebenberg, L. (2011). Assessing resilience across cultures using mixed methods: Construction of the Child and Youth Resilience Measure. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5, 126‒149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811400607.

Xie, Y.; Peng, L.; Zuo, X.; Li, M. (2016). The psychometric evaluation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale using a Chinese military sample. PLOS ONE, 11, e0148843. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148843.

Yu, X.; Lau, J.T.F.; Mak, W.W.S.; Zhang, J.; Lui, W.W.S.; Zhang, J. (2011). Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale among Chinese adolescents. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 52, 218‒224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.05.010.

Lee, J.H.; Nam, S.K.; Kim, A.-R.; Kim, B.; Lee, M.Y.; Lee, S.M. (2013). Resilience: A meta-analytic approach. Journal of Counseling & Development, 91, 269‒279. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2013.00095.x.

About this article

SUBMITTED: 16 August 2026
ACCEPTED: 12 October 2026
PUBLISHED: 26 October 2026
SUBMITTED to ACCEPTED: 57 days

Citations
0
Share this article